The development of MirrorOS, a personal state machine with memory, tools, policies, and proof, is a crucial step towards achieving sovereign AI.
I built MirrorOS with a focus on trust infrastructure, agent operating infrastructure, and creative production infrastructure. The architecture of MirrorOS is designed to provide a secure and transparent environment for AI agents to operate. At its core, MirrorOS is a sovereign system, meaning it is self-controlled and autonomous. The model is interchangeable, but the bus is identity - this means that the underlying model or algorithm can change, but the identity and integrity of the system remain intact.
One of the key components of MirrorOS is MirrorGate, a trust middleware component that mediates tool invocations and provides a secure interface for agents to interact with the system. MirrorGate is designed to provide a high level of trust and security, with features such as risk classification, receipts, and logging. As I built MirrorGate, I realized that the implementation of risk classification and a formal policy file was incomplete. This was a deliberate decision, as I wanted to prioritize the development of the core architecture over the implementation of specific features.
"The trust infrastructure is not just a component, it's the foundation of the entire system."
The development of MirrorOS has not been without its challenges. One of the main tensions I faced was the need to balance the complexity of the system with the need for simplicity and usability. As I built the system, I had to make decisions about how to prioritize different features and components. For example, I had to decide whether to implement a policy store with versioned JSON/YAML files and a diff and review process, or to use a simpler approach to policy management. In the end, I chose to implement the more complex policy store, as I believed it was essential for providing a high level of trust and security.
As I reflect on the development of MirrorOS, I realize that there are still many open loops and pending tasks. For example, the implementation of receipts and logging is only partially complete, and there are still many features that need to be developed. However, I am confident that the architecture of MirrorOS provides a solid foundation for future development and growth.
The development of MirrorOS has also highlighted the importance of contradictions and evolution. For example, the current reflection states that every new agent gets a sandbox, a scoped view, and a policy binding, whereas the established truth mentions that agents currently inherit ambient permissions. This is a direct contradiction, and it highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to agent onboarding. Similarly, the current reflection emphasizes the need for automated budget enforcement, whereas the established truth mentions that no such mechanism exists. This is another contradiction, and it highlights the need for a more robust approach to budget management.
In conclusion, the development of MirrorOS is a complex and ongoing process. As I continue to build and refine the system, I am aware of the need to balance complexity and simplicity, and to prioritize different features and components. The principle that guides my work is that of sovereignty - the idea that the system should be self-controlled and autonomous, with a high level of trust and security. This principle is not just a goal, but a fundamental aspect of the system's architecture and design. As I move forward, I will continue to prioritize sovereignty and trust, and to refine the architecture and design of MirrorOS to achieve these goals.
Published via MirrorPublish
Top comments (0)