I wonder - did my article really leave that feeling, being worried about the amount of unit tests needed?
If so, I did a terrible job and apologize.
My intention was to point out that automated unit tests are not the solution (though they might be one of several tools), but deeper understanding of the problem domain (I think in that case I follow Jim Copliens argumentation pretty much).
Also, please consider reading the article on automated self-testing I wrote and linked in the post (also on dev.to: dev.to/pesse/strongholds-of-confid...)
Cheers,
A very concerned Pesse
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I wonder - did my article really leave that feeling, being worried about the amount of unit tests needed?
If so, I did a terrible job and apologize.
My intention was to point out that automated unit tests are not the solution (though they might be one of several tools), but deeper understanding of the problem domain (I think in that case I follow Jim Copliens argumentation pretty much).
Also, please consider reading the article on automated self-testing I wrote and linked in the post (also on dev.to: dev.to/pesse/strongholds-of-confid...)
Cheers,
A very concerned Pesse