Great thought process! But typeof give the primitive types and they might have thought it's not worth having a separate type for a value that is used very less!
I agree. NaN is really just an unfortunate (but equally appropriate) acronym for something that works like a number.
NaN
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Great thought process! But typeof give the primitive types and they might have thought it's not worth having a separate type for a value that is used very less!
I agree.
NaNis really just an unfortunate (but equally appropriate) acronym for something that works like a number.