This will work Rishit, but it may require some modification into the code and may not work with our logic...
Would you like to work on improving the code? If yes, feel free to fork the repo and send a PR with your full name, and we will give it the highest priority!
Our for loop iterates over these indexes! Changing them is not a good idea...
Anyways our main motive here is to make it easy to understand and follow for beginners & we feel like this is a great way to do it. In case you have come up with a simpler code then please go ahead, fork the code, create a new branch, make modifications & send us your PR for review!
Instead of
This will work Rishit, but it may require some modification into the code and may not work with our logic...
Would you like to work on improving the code? If yes, feel free to fork the repo and send a PR with your full name, and we will give it the highest priority!
Have a great day Rishit ⭐
Not lots of modification required, only changing indexing
Our for loop iterates over these indexes! Changing them is not a good idea...
Anyways our main motive here is to make it easy to understand and follow for beginners & we feel like this is a great way to do it. In case you have come up with a simpler code then please go ahead, fork the code, create a new branch, make modifications & send us your PR for review!
Good Night Rishit!
Well it is a very good idea. I guess you need to just add "+1" to indexing.