The security post is indeed a little concerning, good catch! If you look at the documentation from version 3.0 for example, and version 4.0, it seems like the implementation of ObjectId has changed to use a random value instead of the machine-process combination.
I learned how to code at university, so I've been at it since 2014. I've dabbled in open source contributions but would like to get into it more. Other than 1's and 0's, I love to travel.
The security post is indeed a little concerning, good catch! If you look at the documentation from version 3.0 for example, and version 4.0, it seems like the implementation of ObjectId has changed to use a random value instead of the machine-process combination.
That's the missing piece. Nice find. I wonder if the motivation was to get rid of that potential threat. Thanks for the thoughts!