Its worth noting that Prolog and SQL actually have a LOT in common. Both are declarative languages structured around tables of fact tuples and relationships between them. And then you give it a specification and it returns a set of tuples that match the specification. Prolog of course does a whole lot more (and it perhaps does it an injustice to make the comparison), but if you really boil down to it, the two are very similar. It'd be nice if makers of new databases had another look at prolog. If you wanna go 'past' SQL, maybe Prolog is in fact the future!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Its worth noting that Prolog and SQL actually have a LOT in common. Both are declarative languages structured around tables of fact tuples and relationships between them. And then you give it a specification and it returns a set of tuples that match the specification. Prolog of course does a whole lot more (and it perhaps does it an injustice to make the comparison), but if you really boil down to it, the two are very similar. It'd be nice if makers of new databases had another look at prolog. If you wanna go 'past' SQL, maybe Prolog is in fact the future!