Remember when inserting someone's first name into an email subject line felt revolutionary?
Yeah, that was 2015. Now it's the bare minimum—and honestly, when half your inbox says "Hey {{FirstName}}," it's less personal and more proof that nobody bothered to check their merge tags before hitting send.
But here's where things get interesting. We've moved way past simple mail merge fields into territory that would've seemed like science fiction a few years ago. AI-powered email systems can now predict what content blocks to show you based on your behavior, preferences, and a dozen other signals. They're assembling emails in real-time, customizing not just the greeting but entire sections of content.
The technology is genuinely impressive. The execution? That's where most brands are stumbling.
What Predictive Content Blocks Actually Are
Let's get specific about what we're talking about here.
Predictive content blocks are modular sections of an email that get dynamically selected and arranged based on individual recipient data. Instead of creating one static email that goes to everyone (with maybe their name swapped in), you're creating a library of content modules that an AI system assembles differently for each person.
Think of it like this: You've got 15 different product recommendations, 8 different hero images, 5 different CTAs, and 10 different supporting content sections. The AI looks at Sarah's browsing history, purchase patterns, email engagement, and maybe even external data signals, then assembles an email specifically for her. Meanwhile, Tom gets a completely different combination of those same building blocks.
Braze, Iterable, and Salesforce Marketing Cloud all offer versions of this now. Customer.io has some clever implementations. Even Mailchimp is getting into the game, though they're calling it "predictive segmentation" because apparently we needed another term for essentially the same thing.
The technical foundation usually involves machine learning models trained on your historical engagement data. What did people who looked like this recipient click on? What time did they typically open emails? What product categories correlate with their demographic profile?
The Gap Between Theory and Reality
In theory, this is marketing nirvana. Every email perfectly tailored to each recipient's interests and needs.
In practice, your budget is $12,000, your email list has data quality issues dating back to 2019, and your product catalog updates aren't syncing properly with your ESP. Welcome to the real world.
Here's what I've noticed after working with about a dozen brands implementing this stuff: The technology works. The infrastructure around it? That's the hard part.
You need clean data. Not kind-of-clean data. Actually clean data. Because when your AI decides to recommend winter coats to someone in Miami because their zip code field says "90210" (which is actually their customer ID that got imported into the wrong column), you've got a problem.
You need enough volume to train the models properly. If you're sending to 5,000 people once a month, you don't have enough signal. The AI is basically guessing, just with more computational power behind it.
And you need content. Lots of it. Those modular blocks don't create themselves. Someone has to write 15 different product descriptions, design 8 different hero sections, and maintain all of it when things change.
Where This Gets Creepy (And How to Avoid It)
Look, we've all had that moment where an ad follows us around the internet and we think, "Okay, that's a bit much."
Email personalization can hit that same uncanny valley if you're not careful.
I saw one retail brand that was using browsing behavior to customize emails. Smart, right? Except they were including products people had looked at 18 months ago. Nothing says "we're definitely not tracking you" like an email that references that weird thing you browsed at 2am last year and definitely don't want to be reminded about.
The rule I use: If it would be weird for a helpful salesperson in a physical store to know it, it's probably too much for an email.
A salesperson remembering you bought running shoes last time and asking if you need new ones? Perfectly normal. A salesperson remembering that you looked at running shoes on their website at 11:47pm on a Tuesday three months ago but didn't buy them? Creepy.
Sephora does this pretty well. Their emails reflect your beauty profile and past purchases, but it feels helpful rather than invasive. They're not mentioning that specific lipstick you looked at for 3 seconds on mobile. They're showing you products in categories you've actually purchased from.
Spotify's personalization is another good example—their Wrapped campaign and discovery playlists feel delightful because they're showing you patterns you didn't know existed in your own behavior. That's the sweet spot.
The Data Infrastructure Nobody Wants to Talk About
Here's the thing nobody mentions in those glossy case studies about 300% improvement in email engagement: They spent six months cleaning their data first.
For predictive content blocks to work, you need:
Unified customer profiles. Every interaction across every channel feeding into one place. Your e-commerce platform, your email system, your customer service software, maybe even your brick-and-mortar POS if you've got retail locations. This is the part where most projects stall out.
Real-time (or near-real-time) data sync. If someone just bought something on your website, your email system needs to know about it before it sends them a "complete your purchase" email two hours later. I've seen this happen more times than I should admit.
Proper event tracking. You can't just track "opened email" and "clicked link." You need to know which specific products they viewed, how long they spent on different pages, what they added to cart, what they removed from cart. The more granular, the better.
Historical data. Most AI models need at least 6-12 months of solid data to start making decent predictions. If you're just starting to collect this stuff, you're looking at a waiting period before the AI can do its thing.
Segment and mParticle have built entire businesses around solving this infrastructure problem. There's a reason for that—it's genuinely hard to get right.
What Actually Moves the Needle
After watching a bunch of implementations, here's what seems to matter most:
Timing beats content (usually). An okay email sent at the right time outperforms a perfectly personalized email sent at the wrong time. AI can help with send-time optimization, and that's often where you see the biggest gains. Some people open emails at 6am, some at 9pm. Sending to everyone at 10am because that's when you get to the office is leaving money on the table.
Product recommendations are table stakes. If you're in e-commerce and you're not doing some form of personalized product recommendations, you're behind. This doesn't need to be cutting-edge AI—even basic collaborative filtering ("people who bought X also bought Y") works surprisingly well.
Content hierarchy matters more than you think. It's not just about which blocks to include, but what order to put them in. Someone who's never purchased gets the trust-building content at the top. Someone who's a repeat customer gets the new products up front. This sequencing is where a lot of the value lives.
Subject lines are still underutilized. Everyone's personalizing the email body, but subject lines often stay generic. AI can test and predict which subject line approach will work for different segments. Warby Parker does this well—I've noticed their subject lines vary significantly based on where I am in the customer journey.
The Tools That Don't Suck
Let's talk specifics. Because "use AI-powered personalization" is about as actionable as "create quality content."
For enterprises with budget: Salesforce Marketing Cloud's Einstein features are robust if you can navigate the complexity (and afford it). Braze has some of the most sophisticated predictive capabilities I've seen, particularly for mobile-first brands. Iterable's workflow builder makes the logic relatively approachable.
For mid-market brands: Klaviyo has been adding more predictive features and their data model is solid. Customer.io gives you a lot of flexibility if you've got technical resources. Omnisend is underrated for e-commerce specifically.
For smaller operations: Honestly? Start with good segmentation before jumping to AI. Mailchimp's predictive demographics and purchase likelihood features are a decent entry point. ConvertKit's automation is simple but effective for content creators.
The tool matters less than having your data house in order. I've seen brands get better results with basic segmentation and clean data than fancy AI running on garbage inputs.
Testing Without Losing Your Mind
You can't A/B test everything. You'll be testing until 2027 and still not have statistical significance.
Here's a more practical approach:
Start with one high-impact element. Usually that's product recommendations or content block ordering. Get that working reliably before adding more variables.
Use holdout groups, not traditional A/B tests. Take 10% of your list and send them the old static emails. Send the other 90% the personalized versions. Compare performance over time. This gives you a baseline without needing to run endless tests.
Track the metrics that actually matter for your business. Open rates are vanity metrics (especially with Apple's privacy changes making them unreliable). Look at conversion rate, revenue per email, and customer lifetime value impact.
Give it time. You need at least 30-60 days of data before the AI models start performing well. The first few weeks might actually perform worse as the system learns. This is where a lot of brands panic and shut it down too early.
The Privacy Elephant in the Room
We should probably talk about the fact that all this personalization requires collecting and using a lot of customer data.
GDPR, CCPA, and various other privacy regulations aren't going away. They're getting stricter. And customers are getting more aware of how their data is being used.
The brands doing this right are transparent about it. Stitch Fix literally explains how their algorithms work. Netflix tells you why they're recommending things. This transparency builds trust rather than eroding it.
You also need to give people control. Easy preference centers where they can dial personalization up or down. Clear opt-outs. Actual deletion when someone requests it (not just marking them inactive in your database).
And look, there's a business case here beyond just compliance. Customers who trust you with their data are more likely to share accurate data. Accurate data makes your AI work better. Better AI creates more value. More value builds more trust. It's a virtuous cycle, but only if you don't break that trust.
Where This Goes Next
Multimodal personalization is coming. Not just which content blocks, but which format. Some people prefer text, some prefer video, some prefer infographics. AI systems are starting to predict and deliver content in the format each person prefers.
Cross-channel orchestration is getting more sophisticated. Your email content blocks coordinating with your website experience, your app notifications, even your direct mail if you're still doing that. Iterable and Braze are both pushing hard in this direction.
Generative AI is the obvious next frontier. Instead of selecting from pre-built content blocks, AI writing unique copy for each recipient. We're not quite there yet for email (the quality isn't consistent enough), but it's coming. Probably within the next 18 months for certain use cases.
The jury's still out on whether that's a good thing. There's something to be said for human-written content that's well-targeted versus AI-generated content that's perfectly personalized but soulless.
Making This Actually Work
If you're thinking about implementing predictive content blocks, here's the honest path forward:
Audit your data first. Before spending money on fancy AI tools, spend time understanding what data you have, how clean it is, and what gaps exist. This is boring work. It's also the most important work.
Start with one use case. Don't try to personalize everything at once. Pick your highest-value email flow—usually abandoned cart or post-purchase—and personalize that first. Learn from it, then expand.
Get your content production sorted. You need a system for creating and maintaining all those modular content blocks. This is often where things break down. The AI is ready to personalize, but you only have 3 content blocks to work with.
Measure what matters. Set clear success metrics before you start. Not just engagement metrics, but business outcomes. Revenue impact. Customer retention. Lifetime value changes.
Plan for ongoing optimization. This isn't a set-it-and-forget-it thing. Your models need retraining. Your content needs refreshing. Your segments need reviewing. Budget time and resources for this.
The brands seeing real results from AI-powered personalization aren't the ones with the fanciest technology. They're the ones who did the unglamorous infrastructure work first, started small, and scaled methodically.
Your customers don't care whether you're using cutting-edge AI or well-executed segmentation. They care whether your emails are relevant and valuable. Sometimes that requires sophisticated technology. Sometimes it just requires paying attention to what your data is telling you.
Either way, it definitely requires more than {{FirstName}}.
Top comments (0)