Introduction
Modern data science problems rarely conform to the assumptions of classical linear regression. Real-world datasets often exhibit skewness, non-normal distributions, non-linear trends, or categorical outcomes. To address these challenges, Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) provide a flexible and powerful framework that extends traditional linear regression to a much wider range of applications.
In this article, we explore how GLMs work and how they are applied in practice using R. We focus on three widely used modeling approaches:
Simple Linear Regression (SLR)
Log-Linear Regression
Binary Logistic Regression
Along the way, we explain the underlying statistical intuition, demonstrate use cases with real datasets, and show how these models are implemented using modern R workflows. The goal is to help you understand when and why to use each model—not just how to run the code.
Revisiting Simple Linear Regression
Simple Linear Regression (SLR) models the relationship between a continuous response variable YYY and a single predictor XXX:
Y=α+βX+ϵY = \alpha + \beta X + \epsilonY=α+βX+ϵ
This model assumes:
A linear relationship between X and Y
Normally distributed residuals
Constant variance (homoscedasticity)
Example: Temperature vs. Beverage Sales
Consider a dataset where temperature predicts cola sales on a university campus.
data <- read.csv("Cola.csv")plot(data, main = "Temperature vs Cola Sales")
At first glance, the relationship appears non-linear, with sales accelerating as temperature increases.
We fit a linear model:
model <- lm(Cola ~ Temperature, data)abline(model)
To evaluate model performance:
library(hydroGOF)pred <- predict(model, data)rmse(pred, data$Cola)
The RMSE value (~241) indicates poor predictive accuracy. More importantly, the model produces negative sales predictions at lower temperatures—an obvious violation of real-world logic.
This limitation motivates the use of Generalized Linear Models.Why Generalized Linear Models?
GLMs extend linear regression by allowing:
Non-normal response distributions
Non-linear relationships between predictors and response
A link function connecting the mean of the response to a linear predictor
A GLM consists of three components:
Random component – distribution of the response variable
Systematic component – linear predictor
Link function – connects them
This flexibility makes GLMs ideal for modeling counts, proportions, probabilities, and skewed continuous variables.Log-Linear Regression: Modeling Exponential Growth
Many real-world processes grow multiplicatively rather than linearly—sales growth, population growth, biological processes, and financial returns.
In such cases, a log-linear model is appropriate:
log(Y)=α+βX\log(Y) = \alpha + \beta Xlog(Y)=α+βX
This transformation ensures:
Predictions remain positive
Nonlinear growth becomes linear in log-space
Example: Modeling Cola Sales
data$LogCola <- log(data$Cola)plot(LogCola ~ Temperature, data = data)model_log <- lm(LogCola ~ Temperature, data)abline(model_log)
The model now fits the data much more effectively.
pred_log <- predict(model_log, data)rmse(pred_log, data$LogCola)
The RMSE drops dramatically, confirming improved performance.
Interpretation
A one-unit increase in temperature leads to a percentage change in expected sales.
The model avoids negative predictions entirely.
This approach is commonly used in economics, marketing, and epidemiology.Understanding Log Transformations in Practice
There are three common log-based regression structures:
Model TypeTransformationInterpretation
Log-linear
log(Y) ~ X
Percent change in Y per unit X
Linear-log
Y ~ log(X)
Absolute change in Y per % change in X
Log-log
log(Y) ~ log(X)
Elasticity (percentage change in Y per % change in X)
These transformations help linearize relationships and stabilize variance—key requirements for reliable inference.Binary Logistic Regression
When the dependent variable is categorical (e.g., success/failure, yes/no), linear regression is inappropriate. Instead, logistic regression models the probability of an event occurring.
Example: Penalty Kick Success
Assume we model the probability of scoring a penalty based on hours of practice.
data1 <- read.csv("Penalty.csv")plot(data1)
The response variable takes values 0 or 1, making logistic regression the correct choice.
fit <- glm(Outcome ~ Practice, family = binomial(link = "logit"), data = data1)
To visualize the fitted probabilities:
curve(predict(fit, data.frame(Practice = x), type = "response"), add = TRUE)
Interpretation
The logistic model estimates:
P(Y=1)=11+e−(α+βX)P(Y=1) = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-(\alpha + \beta X)}}P(Y=1)=1+e−(α+βX)1
A positive coefficient implies higher probability of success with increased practice.
Predictions remain between 0 and 1, making them interpretable as probabilities.
Logistic regression is foundational in:
Credit risk modeling
Medical diagnosis
Customer churn prediction
Fraud detection
Conclusion
Generalized Linear Models extend classical regression to handle a wide variety of real-world data scenarios. In this article, we explored:
Linear regression and its limitations
Log-linear models for exponential relationships
Binary logistic regression for classification problems
By choosing appropriate link functions and distributions, GLMs allow analysts to model complex patterns while maintaining interpretability and statistical rigor.
With modern data science workflows increasingly emphasizing explainability alongside accuracy, GLMs remain one of the most valuable tools in applied analytics. Whether you are modeling sales, risk, behavior, or growth, understanding GLMs is essential for building reliable, interpretable models.
Our mission is “to enable businesses unlock value in data.” We do many activities to achieve that—helping you solve tough problems is just one of them. For over 20 years, we’ve partnered with more than 100 clients — from Fortune 500 companies to mid-sized firms — to solve complex data analytics challenges. Our services include power bi consultant, Power BI Consulting, and chatbot service — turning raw data into strategic insight.
Top comments (0)