Thanks, but there is a typo apptets instead of accepts, and I think you should explain the one-off approach too, where you don't need to pass any Set.
Passing new Set is not super handy if you never reuse that Set, so that in such case not passing a second argument to filter(...) provides a better UX.
You could also combine both solutions.
This way you could reuse over and over the given
Set
, but you could also make it a one-shot each time.Done :)
Thanks, but there is a typo
apptets
instead ofaccepts
, and I think you should explain the one-off approach too, where you don't need to pass any Set.Passing
new Set
is not super handy if you never reuse thatSet
, so that in such case not passing a second argument tofilter(...)
provides a better UX.Thanks again, Andrea!
This is a very good hint.
I'll edit soon the post adding this solution with some explanations.
Thank you, Andrea!