DEV Community

Cover image for Rahsi Search Physics™ | Why AI Retrieval Breaks, Remembers or Re-Appears in SharePoint Online
Aakash Rahsi
Aakash Rahsi

Posted on

Rahsi Search Physics™ | Why AI Retrieval Breaks, Remembers or Re-Appears in SharePoint Online

** Read Complete Article ** | https://www.aakashrahsi.online/post/rahsi-search-physics

Rahsi Search Physics™

Why AI Retrieval Breaks, Remembers or Re-Appears in SharePoint Online

Most people still believe Copilot “reads their files” and Azure AI “indexes everything automatically.”

It doesn’t.

Every answer you see — in Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Claude, Azure AI Search, plugins, agents, or any retrieval-augmented workflow — is riding on an invisible substrate:

  • security-trimmed SharePoint Online search
  • Microsoft Search ranking layers
  • connector scope boundaries
  • index freshness windows
  • chunking physics
  • identity-bounded retrieval

When this substrate is misunderstood, AI looks brilliant in demos… and unpredictable in production.

Rahsi Search Physics™ explains this hidden layer.

It is the deep operating model behind why AI retrieval breaks, why answers randomly “reappear,” and why Copilot remembers content you thought was gone — even when nothing “AI-related” changed in your tenant.


1. AI Doesn’t Retrieve Your Files — It Retrieves Your Search Reality

Copilot and Claude do not independently crawl SharePoint Online.

They obey:

  • the SharePoint search index
  • Microsoft Search connectors
  • permissions
  • site inheritance
  • ranking rules
  • ACL trimming
  • result source scopes
  • and the freshness state of your indexed items

This creates a truth that feels shocking the first time you understand it:

AI cannot be better than the search physics beneath it.

If search sees it, AI sees it.

If search misses it, AI misses it.

If search is delayed, noisy, or stale, AI behaves “weird.”

This is not an AI problem — it’s a retrieval physics problem.


2. Why Answers “Come Back From the Dead”

Tenants frequently report:

  • “This file was deleted but Copilot still references it.”
  • “Claude summarized something we archived last week.”
  • “A user lost access, but AI still knows the content.”

This is not memory.

This is index lag + ranking retention + chunk persistence.

The three real culprits:

  1. Index Freshness Lag

    Deletions and permission changes do not instantly invalidate indexed chunks.

  2. Chunk Memory Ghosting

    If an embedding existed from a prior state, it may persist until pruning.

  3. Ranking Echo

    Older signals can temporarily outrank freshly indexed items.

This creates the illusion of AI “remembering” when in reality the retrieval substrate is still flushing old states.


3. Why AI Retrieval Breaks Even When Permissions Are Correct

Your permissions can be perfect.

Your DLP rules can be strict.

Yet AI still behaves inconsistently.

The reason:

metadata gravity.

If your files contain:

  • weak titles
  • missing key fields
  • inconsistent content types
  • non-standard taxonomy
  • sloppy descriptions

…then your AI grounding becomes unstable.

AI does not hallucinate.

It anchors on whatever metadata gravity is strongest.

If that gravity is wrong, your answers are wrong.


4. CVE Weeks: When Retrieval Chaos Exposes Your Tenant

During a major CVE or security advisory, executives want answers:

  • “What content is impacted?”
  • “Who had access?”
  • “Was AI exposed to it?”

Without Rahsi Search Physics™, these questions cannot be answered quickly.

The real danger is not the CVE itself.

The real danger is retrieval inconsistency under pressure.

Rahsi Search Physics™ turns this into a controlled, provable process.


5. Why AI Retrieval Is Sometimes *Too Good*

Ever noticed Copilot perfectly answer a question…

but three days later the same prompt fails?

This is a sign of:

  • index merges
  • ranking drift
  • connector sync delays
  • content-type changes
  • ACL recalculation
  • embedding vector refresh

AI didn’t get worse.

Your retrieval substrate changed.


6. The Rahsi Search Physics™ Model

The model reveals seven governing laws:

1. Identity Law

You do not search the tenant — your identity does.

2. Boundary Law

AI is permanently fenced by connector scopes and site inheritance.

3. Chunk Law

AI understands chunks, not documents.

4. Freshness Law

Index delays create the illusion of memory or hallucination.

5. Gravity Law

Metadata and titles override raw content during grounding.

6. Ranking Law

Top-ranked items shape AI behavior more than “correct” items.

7. Containment Law

If your metadata isn’t engineered, your CVE story collapses.


7. Why This Matters Now

AI is no longer “magic added on top.”

AI is retrieval.

Retrieval is search.

Search is physics.

If you don’t understand the physics,

you cannot govern the AI.

Rahsi Search Physics™ gives you the blueprint the industry has been missing for a decade.


8. Who Should Read This

  • SharePoint Architects
  • M365 Security Teams
  • Azure AI & OpenAI Engineers
  • Governance Leaders
  • CTOs & CISOs
  • Microsoft Partners
  • Copilot Program Owners
  • Information Architects
  • DSPM & Compliance Teams

If you’re tired of AI behaving “randomly,” this framework will finally make everything predictable.


Final Word

Copilot, Claude and Azure AI aren’t unpredictable.

They’re obedient painfully obedient.

They follow the physics beneath them.

When you master the physics,

you master the AI.

And that is the heart of Rahsi Search Physics™.


Top comments (0)