DEV Community

Cover image for The Best AI PCs and NPU Laptops For Engineers

The Best AI PCs and NPU Laptops For Engineers

Ali Farhat on January 16, 2026

This article provides an independent and non affiliated overview of the current AI PC and NPU laptop market. It is written for software developers,...
Collapse
 
hubspottraining profile image
HubSpotTraining

Do you think NPUs will eventually replace discrete GPUs for developers?

Collapse
 
alifar profile image
Ali Farhat

NPUs will handle inference and always-on workloads. GPUs remain essential for training, simulation, graphics and heavy parallel compute. The future is hybrid systems, not replacement.

Collapse
 
hubspottraining profile image
HubSpotTraining

That hybrid framing explains current laptop designs pretty well.

Collapse
 
rolf_w_efbaf3d0bd30cd258a profile image
Rolf W

Why did you not include Snapdragon X Elite laptops? Aren’t they supposed to be strong AI PCs?

Collapse
 
alifar profile image
Ali Farhat

They are interesting, but still risky for many developers.

The hardware looks promising, but tooling, drivers and ecosystem maturity vary depending on your stack. For daily development work, predictability matters more than peak specs. That is why I focused on platforms with fewer unknowns today.

Collapse
 
rolf_w_efbaf3d0bd30cd258a profile image
Rolf W

Fair take. Stability is more important than chasing specs.

Collapse
 
bbeigth profile image
BBeigth

Great overview. One thing I am still unclear on: when would an NPU actually outperform a GPU for LLM inference?

Collapse
 
alifar profile image
Ali Farhat

NPUs outperform GPUs when you care about sustained, low power inference of quantized models. Think background agents, local copilots, embeddings, transcription, or always-on workloads. GPUs still win for large batch inference and anything FP16 or FP32. The real value of NPUs is that they make these workflows usable on a laptop without killing battery or thermals.

Collapse
 
bbeigth profile image
BBeigth • Edited

That distinction between efficiency and throughput clarifies a lot. Makes sense now.

Collapse
 
sourcecontroll profile image
SourceControll

Is it realistic to run something like Llama locally on these machines, or is this still mostly marketing?

Collapse
 
alifar profile image
Ali Farhat

Quantized Llama 7B to 13B models run well locally today if you have enough RAM and the right runtime. You will not train large models on a laptop, but for inference, agents and tooling it works. The constraints are memory and model size, not hype.

Collapse
 
sourcecontroll profile image
SourceControll

Good to hear. That matches my experience with smaller quantized models.

Collapse
 
khriji_mohamedahmed_fd73 profile image
Khriji Mohamed Ahmed

Local LLMs are absolutely usable today for tooling and agents. The bottleneck is RAM and model size, not marketing claims.

Collapse
 
jan_janssen_0ab6e13d9eabf profile image
Jan Janssen

Will you update this article as new hardware releases?

Collapse
 
alifar profile image
Ali Farhat • Edited

Yes, as new CPUs ship and tooling matures, recommendations will evolve. Updates will be based on real workflows rather than launch claims.

Collapse
 
jan_janssen_0ab6e13d9eabf profile image
Jan Janssen

Appreciated. Articles like this age quickly otherwise.