DEV Community

Cover image for What Junior Developers Get Wrong About “Clean Code”
David Brooks
David Brooks

Posted on

What Junior Developers Get Wrong About “Clean Code”

What Junior Developers Get Wrong About “Clean Code”

If you’re a junior developer, you’ve probably heard the phrase “clean code” thrown around a lot.

Write clean code.

This isn’t clean.

Can you refactor this to be cleaner?

Early on, it’s easy to internalize the idea that clean code means clever, abstract, or impressive. In reality, many junior developers overcorrect—and end up making their code harder to understand, not easier.

Let’s talk about what clean code actually means in real-world software teams, and what junior developers commonly get wrong.


1. Clean Code Is Not Clever Code

One of the biggest traps junior developers fall into is trying to be too smart.

You learn:

  • Advanced language features
  • Fancy one-liners
  • Patterns that reduce lines of code

And suddenly this:

ts

if (user && user.isActive && user.hasPermission('ADMIN')) {
  enableAdminPanel();
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Becomes this:

ts

user?.isActive && user?.hasPermission?.('ADMIN') && enableAdminPanel();

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Is it shorter? Yes.
Is it more readable? For most teams — no.

Clean code prioritizes clarity over cleverness. If someone has to slow down to understand it, you’re already losing.

Readability Beats DRY (Especially Early)

“Don’t Repeat Yourself” is a great principle — but junior developers often apply it too aggressively.

This happens a lot:

ts 

function handleUserState(user: User) {
  return isActiveAdmin(user)
    ? getAdminConfig(user)
    : getDefaultConfig(user);
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now the reader has to jump:

  • To isActiveAdmin
  • Then to getAdminConfig
  • Then back again

Sometimes repetition is intentional clarity.

In real codebases, teams often prefer a bit of duplication if it keeps logic easy to follow. DRY is a guideline, not a law.

3. Over-Abstraction Is Usually a Smell

A common junior instinct is to “future-proof” everything.

You might think:

“This might change later, so I should abstract it now.”

That often leads to:

  • Interfaces with only one implementation
  • Services that wrap a single function
  • Config-driven logic no one actually asked for

For example:

ts

interface ButtonBehavior {
  execute(): void;
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

When all you really needed was:

ts

onClick() {
  saveForm();
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Abstractions should exist to solve real problems, not hypothetical ones. Premature abstraction is one of the fastest ways to make a codebase harder to understand and maintain.

A good rule of thumb:

If you can’t clearly explain why an abstraction exists today, it probably shouldn’t exist yet.

4. Naming Is More Important Than Patterns

Junior developers often focus heavily on structure:

  • Design patterns
  • Architecture diagrams
  • Folder layouts

But experienced developers tend to obsess over naming.

Consider this function:

ts

function processData(data: any) {}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
ts

Now compare it to:

function calculateWeeklyStartGoals(jobs: Job[]) {}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The second example immediately tells you:

  • What the function does
  • What kind of data it expects
  • Why it exists

Clear naming:

  • Reduces the need for comments
  • Makes code reviews faster
  • Helps new teammates ramp up more easily
  • Prevents misunderstandings before they happen

Before reaching for a new pattern or abstraction, ask yourself:

“Would better names make this clearer?”

In many cases, improving names does more for code quality than introducing additional structure.

5. Code Is for Humans, Not Your Resume

A tough lesson many junior developers learn over time is that code is rarely judged in isolation.

Your code will be read by:

  • Teammates reviewing your pull request
  • Engineers maintaining it months later
  • Developers who didn’t write it in the first place

The goal isn’t to show how much you know — it’s to make the next person successful.

That usually means:

  • Writing boring, predictable code
  • Being explicit instead of clever
  • Following team conventions
  • Letting your code blend into the codebase

“Boring” code is often excellent code.

If someone can understand your changes quickly and confidently, you’ve done your job well — even if the solution isn’t the most impressive one you could have written.

Final Thoughts

Clean code isn’t about being impressive or using advanced language features. It’s about writing code that clearly communicates intent and behaves predictably over time.

If you’re early in your career, focus less on writing “perfect” code and more on writing understandable code. Clarity compounds. The developers who grow the fastest are the ones whose code is easiest to read, review, and maintain.

You don’t need to be the smartest person on the team — you need to be the most reliable.


About the Author

I’m a full-stack developer with a strong focus on frontend development. I write practical, real-world advice for early-career developers navigating their first few years in the industry.

If you’re interested in technical writing or frontend development, feel free to connect with me on LinkedIn.

Top comments (0)