Modern computers no longer rely on a single processor. Most laptops and servers today ship with multi-core CPUs and large amounts of memory. Yet, many R scripts still run sequentially—using only a fraction of the available hardware power.
If a task can be done faster by splitting it across multiple cores, why not do it?
Parallel processing allows you to divide large workloads into smaller chunks and execute them simultaneously. This can reduce execution time from hours to minutes, or even seconds in some cases. Code efficiency has become a critical skill in data science, machine learning, and analytics engineering, and parallel programming is one of the best ways to achieve that efficiency in R.
Once you learn parallel programming, you’ll likely wonder why you didn’t adopt it sooner.
Understanding Sequential vs Parallel Execution
Before diving into code, it’s important to understand the difference:
Sequential execution
Runs tasks one after another
Uses a single CPU core
Easier to debug
Slower for large workloads
Parallel execution
Runs tasks simultaneously
Uses multiple CPU cores
Faster for compute-heavy operations
Requires careful memory and error handling
Parallelization works best when:
Tasks are independent
Computation is heavy
Data can be split safely
Base R Functions That Improve Speed (But Aren’t Truly Parallel)
Before moving to full parallelization, R offers fast vectorized alternatives to loops.
lapply()
Applies a function over a vector or list and returns a list.
lapply(1:5, function(x) x^2)
Output:
[[1]]
[1] 1
[[2]]
[1] 4
[[3]]
[1] 9
[[4]]
[1] 16
[[5]]
[1] 25
Multiple Outputs with lapply()
lapply(1:5, function(x) c(x^2, x^3))
sapply() – Simplified Output
sapply() tries to simplify the output into vectors or matrices:
sapply(1:5, function(x) x^2)
Returns:
[1] 1 4 9 16 25
sapply(1:5, function(x) c(x^2, x^3))
Matrix output:
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
[1,] 1 4 9 16 25
[2,] 1 8 27 64 125
These functions are efficient but not truly parallel. They are fast because they are internally optimized in C, not because they use multiple cores.
True Parallel Computing in R using parallel Package
The parallel package lets R use multiple CPU cores.
Step 1: Detect Number of Cores
library(parallel)
no_cores <- detectCores()
Step 2: Create a Cluster
clust <- makeCluster(no_cores)
Step 3: Use parLapply()
parLapply(clust, 1:5, function(x) c(x^2, x^3))
Step 4: Stop Cluster
stopCluster(clust)
Always shut clusters to avoid memory leaks.
Using parSapply() for Simplified Output
library(parallel)
clust <- makeCluster(no_cores)
base <- 4
clusterExport(clust, "base")
parSapply(clust, 1:5, function(exponent) base^exponent)
stopCluster(clust)
Why clusterExport()?
Variables created in your R session are not automatically visible to worker cores. You must explicitly export them.
Parallel Programming with foreach and doParallel
For users familiar with loops, this approach feels natural.
Setup
library(foreach)
library(doParallel)
registerDoParallel(makeCluster(no_cores))
Vector Output
foreach(exponent = 1:5, .combine = c) %dopar% base^exponent
Matrix Output
foreach(exponent = 1:5, .combine = rbind) %dopar% base^exponent
List Output
foreach(exponent = 1:5, .combine = list, .multicombine=TRUE) %dopar% base^exponent
Data Frame Output
foreach(exponent = 1:5, .combine = data.frame) %dopar% base^exponent
Closing Implicit Cluster
stopImplicitCluster()
Exporting Variables & Packages in foreach
Export Variables
registerDoParallel(no_cores)
base <- 2
sample_func <- function() {
foreach(exponent = 1:5, .combine = c, .export = "base") %dopar% base^exponent
}
sample_func()
stopImplicitCluster()
Export Packages
library(dplyr)
registerDoParallel(no_cores)
foreach(i = 1:5, .combine = c, .packages = "dplyr") %dopar% {
iris[i, ] %>% select(-Species) %>% sum
}
stopImplicitCluster()
Memory Management in Parallel R
Parallel processing can crash your system if memory is not managed carefully.
PSOCK vs FORK Clusters
By default:
makeCluster()
Uses PSOCK, which spawns new R sessions (more memory usage).
To share memory (Linux/Mac):
clust <- makeCluster(no_cores, type = "FORK")
Use FORK when possible for memory efficiency.
Debugging Parallel Code
Debug File Logging
registerDoParallel(makeCluster(no_cores, outfile = "debug_file.txt"))
foreach(x = list(1:5, "a")) %dopar% print(x)
Safer Per-Core Debug Files
foreach(x = list(1,2,3,4,5, "a")) %dopar%
cat(dput(x), file = paste0("debug_file_", x, ".txt"))
Error Handling with tryCatch()
registerDoParallel(makeCluster(no_cores))
foreach(x = list(1, 2, "a")) %dopar% {
tryCatch({
1/x
}, error = function(e) {
paste0("Error for '", x, "': ", e)
})
}
Cleaning Memory
Remove Objects
rm(base)
Clean Entire Environment
rm(list = ls())
Trigger Garbage Collection
gc()
This is especially helpful in long-running parallel tasks.
When NOT to Use Parallel Processing
Parallelism is powerful, but not always necessary.
Do not parallelize when:
Tasks are very small
There is heavy shared-memory dependency
Debugging complexity outweighs performance gains
Good candidates:
Simulations
Bootstrapping
Cross-validation
Model training
Monte Carlo methods
Large data transformations
Real-World Applications
Parallel processing in R is commonly used in:
Machine learning model training
Hyperparameter tuning
Financial risk simulations
Genomics
Big data transformations
Snowflake + R data pipelines
Tableau and Power BI preparation layers
Final Thoughts
Parallel programming can:
Vastly reduce runtime
Improve scalability
Make your code production-ready
However, it must be used thoughtfully. Start with sequential code, profile bottlenecks, then parallelize where it matters most.
Mastering this skill gives you a massive edge in real-world data science and analytics engineering.
At Perceptive Analytics, our mission is “to enable businesses to unlock value in data.” For two decades, we’ve supported 100+ organizations worldwide in building high-impact analytics systems. Our offerings span tableau consultants and tableau consulting, helping organizations turn raw data into meaningful, decision-ready insights. We would love to talk to you. Do reach out to us.
Top comments (0)