DEV Community

Henry Godnick
Henry Godnick

Posted on

I stopped treating AI spend and doomscrolling as separate problems (and shipped more in 7 days)

I kept making the same mistake:

  • I treated AI cost as a money problem.
  • I treated doomscrolling as a discipline problem.

Turns out they were the same problem: attention leaks.

When my attention was fragmented, my prompts got worse, I retried more, context bloated, and token spend jumped.

The pattern I noticed

On focused build days:

  • fewer prompts
  • cleaner prompts
  • less model hopping
  • lower cost per shipped feature

On scattered days:

  • endless “one more try” loops
  • giant context dumps
  • random tab switching
  • way higher spend with less shipped

The 7-day reset that worked for me

1) Session budget before I start

I set a rough token/cost budget before opening my editor.

2) Smaller briefs, smaller runs

Instead of one mega prompt, I split work into tiny passes.

3) Hard stop on retries

If I hit 3 failed retries, I pause and rewrite the brief.

4) Feed-free build blocks

I block algorithmic feeds during coding windows.

5) Mid-session cost check

One glance halfway through the session changed behavior fast.

6) Model tiering by task

Heavy reasoning only when needed. Everything else goes cheaper.

7) End-of-day 5-minute review

What shipped, what burned budget, what to fix tomorrow.

The tools I ended up building for myself

I couldn’t find exactly what I wanted, so I made two tiny Mac apps:

Not magic. Just immediate feedback loops.

Result

I shipped more in the same hours, while spending less on AI runs.

The key shift: stop treating money and attention as separate dashboards.

They’re one system.

If you’re building solo, track both.

Top comments (0)