DEV Community

Discussion on: Should we be using estimated reading times?

Collapse
 
grahamthedev profile image
GrahamTheDev

It is an interesting one, I think a lot of people are really just after article length and reading times is easier to approach than a word count!

Reading time is generally words / 200.

I recently released a massive article and someone commented that the read time stopped them reading it and put them off. What I am not sure is did the long read time encourage some people to read it?

I did find this article martech.org/estimated-reading-time... which seems to suggest there is some science behind having the reading time, but I only skim read it and haven’t fact checked it so take it with a pinch of salt!

For me, on programming sites, reading time is pointless as I could spend 10 minutes examining a code snippet or I could skip them altogether so the accuracy is questionable at best!

Collapse
 
shadowfaxrodeo profile image
Nathaniel

I actually read your article. And the 68 minutes read time definitely intrigued me rather than put me off.

Thanks for the link I’ll give it a read