In this article I'll tell you about a great replacement for Alpine.js that will help you do the same (and even more) with server-side HTML.
A coup...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
I prefer HMPL for server-side rendering. It handles requests automatically and keeps JS separate from HTML, which is great for complex projects. Alpine.js is better for quick prototyping but can get messy with templates and security risks. If server interactions are key, HMPL is a solid choice.
Alpine is client side, so not sure this is a 1-1 comparison..
It may soon have node.js support, but I don't see much point in that, because ejs already exists.
Alpine is meant as a client-side interactive library is my point so comparing it to something that has server features seems strange. Not every library has to have all the bells and whistles and can just focus on what it set out to accomplish.
HMPL too
Thank you!
Great article! The other alternatives to Alpine.js are jQuery, Vue, and Stimulus. All of them are powerful tools and can be used for large and more complex applications.
Thank you! Yes, that's also an option, only here it's more about working with the server, and these packages themselves are a little different, but you're right in any case
very nice!
Thanks
Regarding the connection with the server, of course, as an alternative.