DEV Community

Discussion on: Falling in love with Gatsby all over again

Collapse
hurricaneinteractive profile image
adro.codes Author

I agree with you that Gatsby is good for content-heavy websites. I mentioned in another comment that if your site has primarily private routes (which is what your TODO example would have since it would be user-based) then Gatsby wouldn't be a good choice and an SSR solution would work better.

However, if you have a content-heavy site with some private route functionality needed, then this approach would definitely work. I threw the PAAS idea into my article as a possibility but you'd probably be trying to do too much.

As for the bad UX around the spinner. I'd argue that if you have a Nextjs app, you'll either have a longer load time (initial load) or use something like nprogress (on page change) while the site finishes loading its data, which could also result in a bad UX experience. With Gatsby, you'll be able to, on-page change, also use nprogress or skeleton content loaders. You'd be able to give the same "loading" experience on both Gatsby and Next (without that much hacking, if any).

With both Gatsby and Next, your page change experience will depend on your API performance, network speed, and the effort you put in to indicate something is processing. As with any app/website, the effort you put into your UX will determine the quality, not the framework you use.

I love both Gatsby and Next, and I definitely agree with you that there are a time and place with both. Definitely depends on the type of website you are trying to build.