Definitely agree on the recommendation to pull in only those dependent modules.
Regarding JSX I assume that is easier / harder based on your familiarity with the syntax.
Oh and of course some features are simpler with d3 selections - animations and transition for example
You haven't to use JSX, you can use vue templates, but JSX is a little more flexible. The idea is to use
<path :d="lineShape(data)" stroke="red" /> <!-- or d={this.lineShape(this.data)} in jsx -->
Instead of
d3.select(this.$el).append('path') .attr('d', this.lineShape(this.data) .attr('stroke', 'red') ;
I think html/svg is more readable
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Definitely agree on the recommendation to pull in only those dependent modules.
Regarding JSX I assume that is easier / harder based on your familiarity with the syntax.
Oh and of course some features are simpler with d3 selections - animations and transition for example
You haven't to use JSX, you can use vue templates, but JSX is a little more flexible. The idea is to use
Instead of
I think html/svg is more readable