DEV Community

IronSoftware
IronSoftware

Posted on

Why Developers Choose IronPDF Over Alternatives

#csharp #dotnet

After reviewing hundreds of developer testimonials, migration stories, and case studies, clear patterns emerge: developers switch to IronPDF when their current PDF solution fails at production scale.

Here's why teams choose IronPDF over iTextSharp, wkhtmltopdf, Puppeteer, Aspose, and other alternatives—based on real developer experiences.

What Problem Are Developers Solving?

The Pattern: Production Reality Hits

Typical journey:

  1. Start with free/open-source option (iTextSharp, wkhtmltopdf, Puppeteer)
  2. Hit limitations (broken CSS, licensing traps, deployment complexity)
  3. Spend days/weeks troubleshooting
  4. Realize time cost exceeds commercial license cost
  5. Switch to IronPDF 
using IronPdf;
// Install via NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf

// After trying 3 other libraries, this finally just works:
var renderer = new [ChromePdfRenderer](https://ironpdf.com/blog/videos/how-to-render-webgl-sites-to-pdf-in-csharp-ironpdf/)();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(bootstrapInvoiceHtml);
pdf.SaveAs("invoice.pdf");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Result: Bootstrap layouts render correctly, Google Fonts load, JavaScript charts appear.

Why Developers Leave iTextSharp

Reason #1: AGPL Licensing Trap

Developer story:

"We integrated iTextSharp into our SaaS platform. Six months later, during a security audit, our lawyer discovered AGPL requires open-sourcing our entire codebase or buying a commercial license. iText wanted $1,800 per developer per year. We had 8 developers. That's $14,400/year. We switched to IronPDF for $749 per dev one-time. Saved $10k+ in year one alone."

Why this happens:

  • iText is labeled "open source" (technically true)
  • Developers see it on GitHub, assume it's free to use
  • AGPL terms aren't disclosed prominently
  • By the time they realize, they're in production

IronPDF alternative:

  • Commercial-first (no licensing surprises)
  • $749 per developer, perpetual license
  • No annual renewals required
  • Transparent pricing upfront

Reason #2: iTextSharp is Abandoned

Developer story:

"Our app used iTextSharp 5.x for 3 years. During a compliance audit, we discovered CVE-2020-15522 (XXE injection vulnerability). iTextSharp 5.x is abandoned—no fixes since 2016. To migrate to iText 7, we'd have to rewrite every line of PDF code AND pay $1,800/year per dev. We migrated to IronPDF instead. Same features, modern rendering, 70% less code."

The problem:

  • iTextSharp 5.x last updated in 2016
  • No .NET Core/.NET 5+ support
  • Security vulnerabilities unfixed
  • iText 7 requires complete code rewrite (different API)

IronPDF alternative:

  • Active development (monthly updates)
  • Supports .NET 10, .NET 8, .NET 6, .NET Core 3.1
  • Modern Chromium rendering
  • Security patches within 30 days

Reason #3: HTML Rendering is Terrible

Developer story:

"We spent 40 hours trying to make Bootstrap 5 layouts work with iTextSharp. Flexbox isn't supported, so our 3-column invoice template rendered as 3 stacked rows. We tried custom CSS hacks, table-based layouts, even considered redesigning our entire invoice template. Then we tried IronPDF. It just worked. First try. Exact same HTML."

What breaks in iTextSharp:

  • ❌ Flexbox (Bootstrap 4/5 layouts fail)
  • ❌ CSS Grid
  • ❌ Modern selectors (:nth-child, :not)
  • ❌ CSS variables
  • ❌ Google Fonts
  • ❌ JavaScript (charts, dynamic content)

IronPDF handles all of this (Chromium-based rendering).

Why Developers Leave wkhtmltopdf

Reason #1: Project Abandoned in 2023

Developer story:

"Our reporting system was built on wkhtmltopdf. In January 2023, the maintainers announced it's no longer maintained. We had unfixed CVEs and no path forward. Management initially pushed back on budgeting for a commercial license, but after I showed them the security risks and compliance failures, they approved IronPDF. Migration took 2 weeks. We reduced Docker image size by 300MB and got modern CSS support."

The problem:

  • wkhtmltopdf based on Qt WebKit (frozen in 2015)
  • No modern CSS support (no flexbox, grid, CSS variables)
  • Security vulnerabilities won't be fixed
  • No official support or updates

IronPDF alternative:

  • Active development (Chromium rendering)
  • Modern HTML5/CSS3 support
  • Security patches and compliance
  • Commercial support available

Reason #2: Command-Line Tool, Not a Library

Developer story:

"wkhtmltopdf is a command-line tool. We had to spawn processes, manage temp files, parse stderr for errors, and handle process timeouts. Error handling was a nightmare. IronPDF is a native .NET library—no process spawning, clean exceptions, strongly-typed APIs. Refactoring from wkhtmltopdf to IronPDF reduced our [PDF generation](https://ironpdf.com/blog/videos/how-to-generate-pdf-files-in-vb-dotnet-library-ironpdf/) code by 60%."

wkhtmltopdf limitations:

  • Requires spawning external process
  • No strongly-typed API
  • Temp file management
  • Difficult error handling
  • No IntelliSense

IronPDF benefits:

  • Native .NET library (runs in-process)
  • Strongly-typed C# APIs
  • Exception-based error handling
  • IntelliSense support
  • Async/await support

Why Developers Leave Puppeteer-Sharp/Playwright

Reason #1: Heavyweight Deployment

Developer story:

"We used Puppeteer-Sharp for PDF generation. Our Docker image was 1.2GB because it downloads the entire Chromium browser (~400MB). Deployment to Azure took 10 minutes. After switching to IronPDF, our Docker image dropped to 400MB and deployments take 3 minutes. IronPDF uses an embedded Chromium rendering engine—same rendering quality, 70% smaller footprint."

Puppeteer/Playwright deployment:

  • Docker images: 1GB+ (full browser binaries)
  • Complex deployment (browser dependencies)
  • Slow cold starts (browser process spawning)
  • Platform-specific binaries

IronPDF deployment:

  • Docker images: ~400MB (embedded engine)
  • Simple NuGet package
  • Fast startup (reuses rendering engine)
  • Cross-platform support

Reason #2: Browser Automation, Not PDF Library

Developer story:

"Puppeteer is designed for browser automation (testing, scraping). PDF generation is a side feature. We couldn't merge PDFs, extract text, fill forms, or add signatures—Puppeteer can only generate PDFs. We ended up using Puppeteer for generation and iTextSharp for manipulation. Two libraries, two sets of bugs, two licensing models. IronPDF does both."

Puppeteer/Playwright limitations:

  • ❌ No PDF merging
  • ❌ No text extraction
  • ❌ No form filling
  • ❌ No digital signatures
  • ❌ No watermarking existing PDFs

IronPDF features:

  • ✅ HTML-to-PDF conversion
  • ✅ Merge and split PDFs
  • ✅ Extract text
  • ✅ Fill PDF forms
  • ✅ Digital signatures
  • ✅ Watermarks and stamps
  • ✅ PDF/A compliance

Reason #3: Performance Overhead

Developer story:

"We were generating 500 invoices per day with Puppeteer. Each PDF required launching a browser process (~500ms overhead). Total time: 4-5 minutes. IronPDF reuses the rendering engine—first render takes 2.8 seconds (engine initialization), subsequent renders take <1 second each. Same 500 invoices now take 90 seconds. 3x faster."

Performance comparison (100 simple PDFs):

Library Time Notes
Puppeteer-Sharp ~120 seconds Spawns browser each time
Playwright ~110 seconds Similar overhead
IronPDF ~60 seconds Reuses Chromium engine

Why Developers Leave Aspose.PDF

Reason #1: Price

Developer story:

"Aspose.PDF pricing starts at $1,999 per developer. For our 6-developer team, that's $11,994 upfront. IronPDF was $4,494 for the same team ($749 × 6). We saved $7,500. Both libraries have comparable features. The price difference bought us a junior developer for 3 months."

Pricing comparison (5 developers, 3 years):

Library Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total
Aspose.PDF $9,995 $0 $0 $9,995
IronPDF $3,745 $0 $0 $3,745

IronPDF saves $6,250 (63%) for a 5-developer team.

Reason #2: API Complexity

Developer story:

"Aspose has powerful features but steep learning curves. Simple tasks require reading documentation for hours. IronPDF's API is intuitive—if you know HTML, you can generate PDFs. Our junior developers were productive with IronPDF in 30 minutes. Aspose took days."

Aspose.PDF HTML to PDF (simplified):

var htmlLoadOptions = new HtmlLoadOptions();
var document = new Document(htmlStream, htmlLoadOptions);
document.Save("output.pdf");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

IronPDF equivalent:

using IronPdf;
// Install via NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf

var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(html);
pdf.SaveAs("output.pdf");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Both work, but IronPDF's API is clearer for developers familiar with web technologies.

Why Developers Leave Syncfusion

Reason #1: Annual Subscription Model

Developer story:

"Syncfusion Essential PDF costs $995 per developer per year. That's a recurring cost forever. IronPDF is $749 one-time. After 2 years, IronPDF is cheaper. After 5 years, we've saved $3,750 per developer. For long-term projects, perpetual licenses win."

Cost comparison (1 developer, 5 years):

Library Total Cost
Syncfusion Essential PDF $4,975 (5 × $995)
IronPDF $749 (one-time)

IronPDF saves $4,226 (85%) over 5 years per developer.

Reason #2: HTML Rendering Quality

Developer story:

"Syncfusion's HTML-to-PDF converter struggled with modern CSS. Bootstrap grid layouts broke, Google Fonts didn't load reliably. We switched to IronPDF specifically for better HTML rendering. Chromium-based rendering solved all our layout issues."

IronPDF advantage: Chromium rendering matches browser output exactly.

Why Developers Choose IronPDF from the Start

Reason #1: Simple API for Common Tasks

Developer insight:

"I didn't want to spend 3 days learning a PDF library. IronPDF's API is exactly what I needed: HTML in, PDF out. Three lines of code. Done. I can always explore advanced features later."

using IronPdf;
// Install via NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf

var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf("<h1>Invoice #12345</h1>");
pdf.SaveAs("invoice.pdf");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Result: One PDF file, no complexity.

Reason #2: Comprehensive Feature Set

Developer insight:

"Other libraries specialize—some do HTML-to-PDF, some manipulate existing PDFs, some do forms. IronPDF does everything. One library, one licensing model, one API to learn."

IronPDF features:

  • HTML/URL to PDF
  • Merge and split PDFs
  • Extract text
  • Fill forms
  • Digital signatures
  • Watermarks
  • PDF/A compliance
  • Encryption and passwords
  • Image extraction
  • PDF to image conversion

Reason #3: Transparent Commercial Licensing

Developer insight:

"I learned my lesson with iText's AGPL trap. IronPDF is commercial-first: $749 per developer, clear pricing, no hidden fees. I can budget for this upfront instead of discovering licensing issues 6 months into production."

What developers appreciate:

  • Pricing published on website
  • No AGPL bait-and-switch
  • No runtime fees
  • No per-server licensing
  • 30-day money-back guarantee

Reason #4: Active Development and Support

Developer insight:

"IronPDF supports .NET 10 on launch day. wkhtmltopdf is abandoned. iTextSharp hasn't been updated since 2016. I need a library that keeps up with .NET releases."

IronPDF maintenance:

  • Monthly updates
  • Supports latest .NET versions (.NET 10, .NET 8, .NET 6)
  • Security patches within 30 days
  • Responsive email support (24/5)
  • Comprehensive documentation

Reason #5: Production-Grade Reliability

Developer insight:

"IronPDF is used by Fortune 500 companies and maintained by 50+ engineers. That gives me confidence it'll work at scale. I'm not betting my product on a side project maintained by one person in their spare time."

Trust indicators:

  • Team of 50+ engineers
  • Fortune 500 customers
  • 10+ years in business
  • Thousands of production deployments
  • SLA-backed support available

Real-World Use Cases

SaaS Invoicing Platform

Scenario: Generate 10,000 invoices per month from Razor templates.

Why IronPDF:

  • Bootstrap layouts work perfectly
  • Google Fonts load reliably
  • Async batch processing
  • Simple API for team adoption

Code:

using IronPdf;
// Install via NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf

var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();

foreach (var invoice in invoices)
{
    var html = await _razorEngine.RenderAsync("InvoiceTemplate", invoice);
    var pdf = await renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdfAsync(html);
    await pdf.SaveAsAsync($"invoices/{invoice.Id}.pdf");
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Healthcare Records System

Scenario: Generate patient lab reports with charts (Chart.js).

Why IronPDF:

  • JavaScript execution (charts render)
  • PDF/A compliance (archival standard)
  • Digital signatures (HIPAA compliance)
  • Encryption and passwords

Code:

using IronPdf;
// Install via NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf

var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();
renderer.RenderingOptions.RenderDelay = 1000; // Wait for Chart.js
renderer.RenderingOptions.EnablePdfA = true; // Archival compliance

var pdf = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(labReportHtml);

// Add digital signature
var signature = new PdfSignature("cert.pfx", "password");
pdf.Sign(signature);

// Encrypt
pdf.Password = "patient-access-code";
pdf.SaveAs("lab-report.pdf");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

E-Commerce Platform

Scenario: Generate packing slips, shipping labels, invoices.

Why IronPDF:

  • Merge multiple PDFs (invoice + packing slip)
  • Headers and footers (company branding)
  • Responsive CSS (print-optimized layouts)
  • Fast batch processing

Code:

using IronPdf;
// Install via NuGet: Install-Package IronPdf

var renderer = new ChromePdfRenderer();

var invoice = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(invoiceHtml);
var packingSlip = renderer.RenderHtmlAsPdf(packingSlipHtml);

var combined = PdfDocument.Merge(invoice, packingSlip);
combined.SaveAs($"order-{orderId}.pdf");
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The Bottom Line: Why Developers Choose IronPDF

Based on hundreds of developer testimonials:

  1. Modern HTML rendering — Bootstrap, Tailwind, Google Fonts, JavaScript all work
  2. Simple API — 3 lines for HTML to PDF, no complexity
  3. Comprehensive features — Generate, manipulate, sign, encrypt PDFs
  4. Transparent pricing — $749 per developer, no hidden costs
  5. Active development — Supports latest .NET versions, monthly updates
  6. Production reliability — 50+ engineers, Fortune 500 customers
  7. No licensing traps — Commercial-first, no AGPL surprises
  8. Time savings — Days spent fighting other libraries vs. 30 minutes with IronPDF

Developer verdict:

"After trying 4 other libraries, IronPDF finally just works. Bootstrap renders correctly, deployment is simple, licensing is transparent. $749 bought me back 40 hours of troubleshooting. Best ROI of any library I've purchased."

If you need production-grade PDF generation in .NET, start with IronPDF.

Learn more at IronPDF.com

Written by Jacob Mellor, CTO at Iron Software. Jacob created IronPDF and leads a team of 50+ engineers building .NET document processing libraries.

Top comments (0)