It's actually crazy how it's hard for us humans to tell when an article was written by AI and when it wasn't. I did the same thing but to a bigger extend, which was documented here if you are interested
Tech Lead/Team Lead. Senior WebDev.
Intermediate Grade on Computer Systems-
High Grade on Web Application Development-
MBA (+Marketing+HHRR).
Studied a bit of law, economics and design
Location
Spain
Education
Higher Level Education Certificate on Web Application Development
Mostly it isn't that hard - they always have a certain 'feel' to them... whenever I'm suspicious I run it through a GPT detector and my hunch is usually correct
So far I'm fairly confident I can tell when AI has been used. It's pretty sad if people's reading ability and discernment are so poor that they airways fall for it; though too many people fall for the lies spouted by politicians, so go figure...
From what I've seen so far AI generated text is usually highly descriptive; verbose and has no personality. It avoids expressing an opinion, but instead presents all possible sides of an argument. It's soulless and boring. Just what you would expect...
@blindfish3@jonrandy sometimes it is really obvious, don't get me wrong. But as someone that picked up english as his 3rd language I would lie if I told you that I can always pick up on it.
Tech Lead/Team Lead. Senior WebDev.
Intermediate Grade on Computer Systems-
High Grade on Web Application Development-
MBA (+Marketing+HHRR).
Studied a bit of law, economics and design
Location
Spain
Education
Higher Level Education Certificate on Web Application Development
AI generated text is usually highly descriptive; verbose and has no personality. It avoids expressing an opinion, but instead presents all possible sides of an argument.
So at the end it outputs what any adult discussion should look like (at least in the science-related world, though it won't be true in yellow journalism for example) 😅
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
It's actually crazy how it's hard for us humans to tell when an article was written by AI and when it wasn't. I did the same thing but to a bigger extend, which was documented here if you are interested
Hi @aneshodza thank you for sharing! I'll take a gander for sure 😁
Mostly it isn't that hard - they always have a certain 'feel' to them... whenever I'm suspicious I run it through a GPT detector and my hunch is usually correct
So far I'm fairly confident I can tell when AI has been used. It's pretty sad if people's reading ability and discernment are so poor that they airways fall for it; though too many people fall for the lies spouted by politicians, so go figure...
From what I've seen so far AI generated text is usually highly descriptive; verbose and has no personality. It avoids expressing an opinion, but instead presents all possible sides of an argument. It's soulless and boring. Just what you would expect...
@blindfish3 @jonrandy sometimes it is really obvious, don't get me wrong. But as someone that picked up english as his 3rd language I would lie if I told you that I can always pick up on it.
So at the end it outputs what any adult discussion should look like (at least in the science-related world, though it won't be true in yellow journalism for example) 😅