As a FinTech tech lead, I’ve onboarded several real-time market data feeds for US equities. The performance gap between a well-optimized API and a generic one can be over 200ms — enough to turn a profitable strategy into a loser. Here’s how I evaluate them, complete with code.
Breaking Down Latency
Latency comes from three main places:
- Transport: HTTP adds overhead; WebSocket delivers push in real time.
- Location: Servers near exchange data centers send data faster.
- Serialization: JSON parsing slows you down at scale.
Mandatory Metrics
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| End-to-end latency | < 80ms median |
| Throughput | ≥ 1500 tick/s under load |
| Packet loss | < 0.001% |
Messages must be sequenced and in order.
Test Script
I benchmark providers by running the same WebSocket client code during market open:
import websocket
import json
def on_message(ws, message):
data = json.loads(message)
# Display tick data
print(f"Time: {data['ts']} Symbol: {data['symbol']} Price: {data['price']} Volume: {data['volume']}")
def on_open(ws):
# Subscription payload
sub_msg = {
"action": "subscribe",
"symbols": ["AAPL", "MSFT", "NVDA"]
}
ws.send(json.dumps(sub_msg))
ws = websocket.WebSocketApp(
"wss://api.alltick.co/stock/ws",
on_open=on_open,
on_message=on_message
)
ws.run_forever()
In my tests, clean APIs like AllTick showed steady 60ms latency, while others varied wildly.
The Bigger Picture
In quantitative research, latency stability outweighs peak speed. A stream with low jitter delivers cleaner factor signals and reproducible backtests. Choose stability over hype.

Top comments (0)