Today, I experimented with vibe coding for the first time using Warp, and honestly… it felt wild.
I didn’t write a single line of code manually.
Instead, I just described:
- what I wanted to build
- what should happen next
- And Warp generated the code for me.
For quick prototyping, this felt incredibly fast and smooth.
The Good Part
- Warp did a solid job with:
- Generating project structure
- Writing boilerplate code
- Moving ideas forward quickly
For early-stage development, this can save a lot of time and mental energy.
If your goal is to test an idea fast, vibe coding definitely helps.
The Reality Check
Once I reviewed the generated code properly, I noticed:
- Multiple bugs
- Logical issues
- Edge cases not handled well
The code worked, but it wasn’t production-ready.
This is where developer experience still matters:
- Debugging
- Refactoring
- Understanding what the code is actually doing
AI can write code, but it doesn’t fully understand context, intent, or long-term maintainability.
Current Status of the Project
The site is still under development.
I’m actively:
- Fixing bugs
- Improving logic
- Cleaning up the codebase
Once everything is stable, I’ll share:
- What the site does
- How it was built
- What worked well with vibe coding (and what didn’t)
Key Takeaway
AI-assisted coding is a powerful accelerator, not a replacement for fundamentals.
Tools like Warp are great for:
- Rapid experimentation
- Reducing repetitive work
- Exploring ideas faster
But understanding the code and taking responsibility for quality is still on us as developers.
If you’ve tried vibe coding or AI-first workflows, I’d love to hear your experience 👇
What worked for you, and what didn’t?
Happy building 🚀
Top comments (0)