Debugging a python list comprehension bug.
Problem Statement: While processing CSV upload data for a user analytics dashboard the sessions count(n-3) didn't match with the expected session count(n).
The problem: The data processing script was silently dropping invalid session IDs
Can you spot the issue?
Processing session durations from CSV upload
session_data = ['120', '45', '300', '', '75', 'N/A', '180']
This looked clean and pythonic...
valid_sessions = [int(duration) for duration in session_data if duration.isdigit()]
print(f"Analyzed {len(valid_sessions)} sessions")
Output: "Analyzed 4 sessions"
But we had 7 rows in the CSV!
What went wrong:
Empty strings and 'N/A' values were silently ignored
No logging of dropped records
Users' data was incomplete, but they had no idea why
The fix:
pythonsession_data = ['120', '45', '300', '', '75', 'N/A', '180']
valid_sessions = []
invalid_count = 0
for duration in session_data:
if duration.isdigit():
valid_sessions.append(int(duration))
else:
invalid_count += 1
print(f"Warning: Invalid session duration '{duration}' - skipped")
print(f"Processed {len(valid_sessions)} sessions, skipped {invalid_count} invalid entries")
Key Takeaway: List comprehensions are elegant, but when processing user data, explicit error handling saves hours of debugging and maintains data integrity.
1 NA can make your code NA.
Have you been bitten by silent data loss? What's your go-to pattern for robust data validation?
hashtag#Python hashtag#DataProcessing hashtag#CSV hashtag#DataValidation hashtag#SoftwareDevelopment
Top comments (0)