**
dbt-Workbench
**
A few months ago, I found myself doing the same thing over and over again.
Open dbt Cloud.
Click through models.
Check lineage.
Open docs.
Switch projects.
Repeat.
None of this was bad. dbt Cloud does its job well. But the more I worked across different environments — local setups, on-prem systems, restricted networks — the more friction I felt. Not enough to complain loudly, but enough that it stayed in the back of my mind.
Why does this workflow feel heavier than it needs to be?
The gap I kept running into
Most dbt workflows eventually revolve around the same questions:
What models exist here?
How does this model depend on others?
What changed recently?
Can I quickly inspect the SQL behind this?
What happened in the last run?
You don’t need a lot of bells and whistles to answer those questions. You need visibility, clarity, and speed.
But when you’re not fully cloud-native — or when you care about running things locally, on-prem, or inside constrained environments — options thin out quickly. You either stitch together scripts, or you accept that some things will always live behind a hosted service.
That’s fine for many teams. It just wasn’t fine for all of my use cases.
So I started experimenting
At first, it was just curiosity.
What if dbt artifacts themselves — manifest.json, run_results.json, catalog.json—were enough to power a clean UI?
What if you didn’t need a remote service to explore your project?
What if switching between dbt projects felt as lightweight as switching folders?
I started hacking together a small UI that simply read what dbt already produces. No magic. No extra metadata. Just visibility.
That experiment slowly grew into something more intentional.
Enter dbt-Workbench
I ended up building dbt-Workbench: a self-hosted, open-source UI for dbt projects.
Not as a replacement for dbt Cloud, but as an alternative for situations where you want:
Local or on-prem setups
No vendor lock-in
Multiple dbt projects in one place
Direct access to compiled SQL and artifacts
A UI that stays close to how dbt actually works
The idea was simple:
Let dbt be dbt. Just make it easier to see what’s going on.
What it focuses on (and what it doesn’t)
dbt-Workbench isn’t trying to reinvent dbt. It leans on what dbt already does well.
Become a member
It gives you:
Model browsing and documentation
Lineage visualization
A SQL workspace that shows compiled SQL side by side with model code
Run history and logs
Multi-project support with proper isolation
A plugin-friendly architecture for extensions
What it doesn’t try to do:
Abstract dbt away
Hide how dbt works
Replace your existing workflows overnight
You can run it locally with Docker, point it at your dbt artifacts, and see value almost immediately.
Why open source mattered here
This kind of tool only makes sense if it’s transparent.
Teams have different constraints:
Air-gapped environments
Strict security policies
Custom dbt setups
Unusual warehouse configurations
Open source makes it possible to adapt the UI to those realities instead of forcing everything into one mold.
It also keeps the project honest. If something feels wrong or unnecessary, it shows up quickly when other engineers look at it.
Still early, intentionally
dbt-Workbench is very much a work in progress. Some parts are solid, others are actively evolving. That’s intentional.
I’d rather build it in the open, shaped by real feedback, than polish something in isolation and hope it fits.
If you’re curious, the project lives here:
https://github.com/rezer-bleede/dbt-Workbench
No signup. No sales pitch. Just code.
Final thought
Most of us don’t need more tools.
We need tools that quietly reduce friction.
dbt-Workbench is my attempt at one of those. If it resonates, great. If it sparks ideas or critiques, even better.
That’s usually how the best tools start anyway.
Connect with Me on LinkedIn
I’d love to keep the conversation going. If you found this article insightful or have thoughts, experiences, and ideas to share, let’s connect on LinkedIn!
I’m always eager to engage with fellow professionals and enthusiasts in the field.
Top comments (0)