DEV Community

TildAlice
TildAlice

Posted on • Originally published at tildalice.io

FastAPI vs Flask ML Serving: 5 Benchmarks Beginners Miss

The Test That Changed My Mind

Flask served my first production model for 18 months without issue. Then I rewrote it in FastAPI, ran the same benchmark suite, and watched throughput jump 3.2x on identical hardware.

But that's not the whole story. The tests most beginners run — wrk with a single endpoint, no preprocessing, no real model logic — miss the patterns that actually matter when you're serving ML models. Load testing an empty route tells you nothing about inference latency under concurrent requests, nothing about CPU-bound preprocessing bottlenecks, and nothing about memory behavior when multiple models share the same process.

This post walks through five benchmarks designed specifically for ML serving scenarios: synchronous inference, async preprocessing pipelines, concurrent model loading, streaming predictions, and multipart file uploads with image models. All tests use real (albeit toy) scikit-learn and PyTorch models, not return {"prediction": 42}.

An artistic view of an empty measuring glass highlighting metric and ounce measurements.

Photo by Steve Johnson on Pexels

Why Most Flask vs FastAPI Benchmarks Are Useless


Continue reading the full article on TildAlice

Top comments (0)