The 47x Throughput Gap That Changed My Deployment Strategy
Here's a number that stopped me cold: vLLM processes 47 concurrent requests while llama.cpp handles exactly one. Same model, same GPU, wildly different architectures. Most "local LLM deployment" guides treat these three tools as interchangeable. They're not. Picking the wrong one doesn't just cost performance — it can blow your entire project timeline.
I've deployed all three in different contexts: a hobbyist chatbot, a batch document processor, and a multi-user API. Each time, the "best" tool was different. The frameworks solve fundamentally different problems, and understanding those differences saves weeks of refactoring.
What Each Framework Actually Optimizes For
Let's cut through the marketing. These tools target three distinct deployment philosophies.
Continue reading the full article on TildAlice

Top comments (0)