Abstract
ValoraBTC is an infrastructure protocol focused on routing and settling Bitcoin liquidity across heterogeneous BTC representations. It is not a wrapped BTC clone, not a Bitcoin L2, and not a custody layer. This document outlines the system’s positioning, design goals, and architectural boundaries.
What ValoraBTC is? and what it is not?
ValoraBTC is not:
- A wrapped BTC issuer
- A Bitcoin Layer-2
- A custody solution
- A yield engine
ValoraBTC is:
- A BTC liquidity routing and settlement protocol
- A coordination layer between multiple BTC “rails”
- A system designed to optimize flow, verification, and settlement, not to replace Bitcoin itself
The protocol assumes a future where BTC liquidity exists simultaneously across multiple representations (native BTC, bridged BTC, synthetic BTC, vault-based BTC). Rather than competing with these systems, ValoraBTC coordinates between them.
Core principle: coordination, not custody
At no point does ValoraBTC attempt to:
- Hold user BTC in a discretionary manner
- Abstract Bitcoin’s security model
- Replace existing trust assumptions
Instead, it defines:
- Rules for routing BTC liquidity
- Settlement logic between rails
- Incentive alignment for validators and coordinators
Custody risk is deliberately minimized by design.
Dual-token system overview
ValoraBTC uses two distinct tokens with separated responsibilities.
VLBTC — ecosystem & value layer
- Fixed supply: 21,000,000
- Represents long-term participation in the ecosystem
- Used for governance, staking, and protocol incentives
- Distributed via presale, ecosystem allocation, and governance programs
VLBTC is not minted, not rebased, and not inflationary.
VLCOR — coordination & settlement layer
- Minted and burned 1:1 with BTC entering or leaving the system
- Used internally for routing, validation, and settlement logic
- Not marketed and not intended for speculative use
- Exists only while corresponding BTC is active in the system
This separation prevents technical mechanics from interfering with economic signaling.
Explicit non-goals (by design)
ValoraBTC explicitly avoids:
- Inflationary reward schemes
- Unsustainable APYs
- Immediate token transfer before TGE
- Hidden liquidity recycling
- Implicit custody assumptions
Liquidity provisioning, vesting, and token claims follow predefined and auditable rules.
Why this architecture exists
BTC DeFi is structurally fragmented. No single bridge, vault, or L2 can realistically become the universal standard. ValoraBTC treats this fragmentation as a given and focuses on interoperability and coordination rather than dominance.
Closing note
This post defines system boundaries, not marketing claims. Subsequent protocol notes will explore token separation, settlement logic, and risk considerations in greater depth.
References:
Whitepaper v1.2 — ValoraBTC Protocol
https://valorabtc.com
https://valorabtc.com/assets/ValoraBTC-Whitepaper.pdf
https://github.com/ValoraBTC/valorabtc-protocol
Related protocol notes
Why BTC DeFi will not converge to a single bridge or Layer-2
https://dev.to/valorabtc_protocol/why-btc-defi-will-not-converge-to-a-single-bridge-or-layer-2-269oSeparating value from coordination: the VLBTC and VLCOR model
https://dev.to/valorabtc_protocol/separating-value-from-coordination-the-vlbtc-and-vlcor-model-173nDesign constraints and risk considerations in BTC routing systems
https://dev.to/valorabtc_protocol/design-constraints-and-risk-considerations-in-btc-routing-systems-4imk
Top comments (0)