When working with eCommerce platforms, product feeds often become a hidden source of complexity.
Most stores already have a product feed — for Google Shopping, marketplaces, or internal integrations.
However, when trying to reuse the same feed for Meta (Facebook & Instagram) catalogs, things often break.
Even if the product data itself is correct, platforms expect different:
- field structures
- required attributes
- formats
- validation rules
This usually leads to one of two outcomes:
- maintaining separate feeds per platform
- manually adjusting feeds whenever requirements change
Neither scales particularly well.
Why existing feeds often fail for Meta
Meta catalogs are strict about structure and required fields.
Feeds built for other platforms (for example, Google Shopping) often contain the right data, but not in the exact format Meta expects.
Common issues include:
- missing or mismatched availability values
- incorrect price formatting
- unsupported or misplaced attributes
- category and brand mapping problems
The result is frequent feed rejections or partially imported catalogs.
A more practical approach: adapt instead of rebuild
In many cases, rebuilding a feed from scratch isn’t necessary.
If you already have:
- a Google Shopping XML feed
- a generic XML export
you can reuse that data by adapting the feed structure instead of recreating everything.
The key is mapping existing fields to platform-specific requirements and generating a compatible output format.
How this typically works in practice
- Start with an existing product feed (XML).
- Normalize the product data (IDs, prices, availability).
- Map feed fields to Meta catalog attributes.
- Generate a Meta-compatible output feed.
- Upload the resulting feed to Meta Commerce Manager.
This approach keeps product data in one place and reduces long-term maintenance effort.
When this approach makes sense
Adapting existing feeds is especially useful when:
- your platform doesn’t offer a native Meta export
- native exports are too limited
- you manage multiple sales or marketing channels
- feed requirements change frequently
It allows you to stay flexible without locking yourself into a specific platform or plugin.
Example: using a feed converter
I documented this approach using a small, platform-agnostic feed converter that adapts existing product feeds into Meta-compatible formats.
It works with existing XML feeds and focuses on structure and field mapping rather than data generation.
If you’re interested, you can see the approach here:
product feed converter
Final thoughts
Product feeds don’t need to be rebuilt every time you add a new channel.
In many cases, adapting existing data is simpler, more maintainable, and easier to scale — especially when working across multiple platforms.
Top comments (0)