If you run a business, you’ve probably heard some version of: “We should add AI.”
But the real question in 2026 won’t be whether you use AI — it’ll be where AI actually belongs in your product and operations, and where it quietly makes things worse.
New Jersey is an interesting lens for this because it’s one of the places in the US trying to turn AI into a real ecosystem (not just hype). The NJ AI Hub is explicitly focused on connecting research, startups, and workforce training. NJEDA has partnered with CoreWeave on a $20M AI Hub fund to support startups tied to that ecosystem.
So here are the AI development trends for 2026 that I think businesses should care about — with a practical “what to do next” for each.
1) “Agentic AI” moves from demos to real workflows
In 2024–2025, a lot of teams shipped chat.
In 2026, the trend is agents that do work: not just answering questions, but running steps like:
- collecting information
- generating drafts
- updating tools (CRM, tickets, dashboards)
- escalating to humans when needed
What changes for businesses:
AI stops being a “feature” and becomes a workflow layer. That means your underlying process has to be clean, or you’ll automate the mess.
Relatable example:
A team adds an “AI sales assistant” that logs calls and updates CRM fields… except the team still can’t agree on what counts as a “qualified lead.” The AI just makes the wrong process run faster.
Do this before agents:
Write the process in plain English first. If you can’t explain the steps to a new hire, don’t automate them.
2) RAG becomes the default (but only if your knowledge isn’t trash)
Most businesses don’t want a model “making things up.” They want AI that answers from their docs, policies, tickets, and data.
That’s why RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) keeps becoming the practical default: “use the model, but ground it in real sources.”
Relatable example:
A support team added an AI chatbot before cleaning up their FAQ. Support tickets drop for a week… then customers return angrier because the bot confidently answered from outdated articles.
What’s new in 2026:
Teams will invest more in content hygiene + source-of-truth than in “prompt tricks.”
Do this next:
Pick one knowledge source (Help Center / SOPs / Notion / Confluence) and make it accurate before you “AI-enable” it.
3) Multimodal AI becomes normal for real businesses
It’s not just text.
By 2026, more business AI will handle images, documents, voice, and video — especially in sectors like healthcare, insurance, logistics, and customer support.
Relatable example:
The ops team manually checks invoice PDFs and shipment photos. Multimodal AI can flag mismatches fast — but only if your labeling and exception rules are clear.
Do this next:
Start with a narrow “document lane” (invoices, claims, onboarding forms). Measure accuracy and time saved before expanding.
4) AI governance becomes a product requirement, not a policy doc
The more AI touches sensitive data (customers, employees, pricing, finance, healthcare), the more businesses will need:
- Access control
- Logging + audit trails
- “What did the AI see?” visibility
- Red-team testing for harmful outputs
This isn’t optional in regulated industries — and even in unregulated ones, it’s how you avoid “AI incidents” becoming your brand.
NJ angle (why it matters here):
If NJ is actively building AI infrastructure and startup funding around AI ecosystems, businesses in the region will get pulled into more AI usage faster — which increases the need for guardrails.
Do this next:
Create a simple rule: No customer data goes into any model workflow unless it’s logged, masked, and reviewed.
5) On-device + “small AI” grows because AI costs are real
A hidden trend: businesses are realizing AI isn’t just “cool.” It has ongoing cost (compute + latency + vendor dependency).
By 2026, more teams will use:
- Smaller models for lightweight tasks
- On-device inference when possible
- Hybrid approaches (small model for first pass, bigger model for complex cases)
Relatable example:
A team uses a giant model to classify incoming emails. It works… but the monthly bill grows faster than revenue. A smaller classifier would’ve done 80% of the job at a fraction of the cost.
Do this next:
Track “cost per outcome,” not “cost per token.” Example: $ per resolved ticket or $ per qualified lead.
6) Healthcare + finance will stay the two highest-pressure AI lanes
These industries have money + data + urgency:
- Healthcare: triage, documentation, billing, compliance, patient support
- Finance: fraud detection, risk analysis, customer service, internal productivity
Relatable example:
AI-generated summaries in healthcare sound great… until you find out they’re summarizing the wrong fields because workflows aren’t standardized.
Do this next:
Start AI with assistive tasks, not “fully automated decisions.” Humans stay in the loop until reliability is proven.
The 2026 test: “Does AI reduce confusion or hide it?”
Here’s the blunt filter I use:
If your team can’t agree on the rules, AI will not fix it.
AI will make the disagreement harder to see — until churn, refunds, or compliance issues force it into the open.
This perspective comes from hands-on work with teams trying to adopt AI in real products, especially in healthcare, SaaS, and internal tools, where timing matters more than tooling. We’ve seen that teams get the best results when AI is introduced after workflows, ownership, and data are already stable, not before.
For anyone curious about how this looks in practice, here’s how we approach AI development with businesses navigating these decisions.
That’s why the winning pattern in business AI adoption (including what I’m seeing around startups) looks like:
- Get the workflow stable
- Get data consistent
- Define success clearly
- Then add AI as a multiplier
Quick checklist (use this before you build anything)
If you can’t answer these, wait:
- What decision or task does AI improve?
- What does “better” mean (speed, accuracy, cost)?
- What happens when AI is wrong? (fallback path)
- What data is allowed and not allowed?
- Can we measure outcomes weekly?
One question for founders / operators
What’s the most “AI sounded smart but made things worse” moment you’ve seen in a real business workflow?
I wrote a deeper breakdown here with more examples + the “AI comes after clarity” framework.
Top comments (0)