Automated testing has become a core practice in modern software development.
Today, testing doesn’t just happen on a local machine—it is integrated directly into Continuous Integration (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring every code change is validated before reaching production.
In this article, we explore and compare three widely used testing management tools within CI/CD environments: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, and Jenkins.
Each one includes a real-world pipeline example so you can understand how test automation works in practice.
💡 Why Testing in CI/CD Matters
Automated test executions help teams:
- Prevent bugs before merging code
- Detect regressions quickly
- Standardize test execution across environments
- Improve software reliability and delivery speed
- Reduce manual testing overhead
Today’s development workflows expect speed and consistency—CI/CD testing delivers both.
🧩 Tools Overview
🟦 GitHub Actions
A cloud-based automation platform built into GitHub.
It uses YAML workflows and triggers on events like push, merge, or pull_request.
🟥 GitLab CI/CD
A complete DevOps platform where CI/CD is deeply integrated.
It uses “runners” to execute jobs and supports built-in testing, security scans, and deployment pipelines.
🟩 Jenkins
An open-source automation server used for customizable pipelines.
Requires installation and configuration but offers massive flexibility.
🌍 Example Scenario
To compare the tools fairly, we use the same simple case:
👉 Run test scripts automatically after every push.
We assume the project uses a test command such as:
npm test -- --coverage
🔧 Real CI/CD Pipelines
🟦 1. GitHub Actions Pipeline
Create a file:
.github/workflows/ci.yml
Add:
name: Run Automated Tests
on:
push:
branches: [ "main" ]
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Install packages
run: npm install
- name: Run unit tests
run: npm test -- --coverage
- name: Upload coverage results
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: coverage
path: coverage/
🟥 2. GitLab CI/CD Pipeline
Create:
.gitlab-ci.yml
Add:
stages:
- test
unit_tests:
stage: test
script:
- npm install
- npm test -- --coverage
artifacts:
paths:
- coverage/
🟩 3. Jenkins Pipeline (Jenkinsfile)
Create:
Jenkinsfile
Add:
pipeline {
agent any
stages {
stage('Install') {
steps {
sh 'npm install'
}
}
stage('Run Tests') {
steps {
sh 'npm test -- --coverage'
}
}
stage('Archive Coverage') {
steps {
archiveArtifacts artifacts: 'coverage/**'
}
}
}
}
📊 Quick Comparison
| Feature | GitHub Actions | GitLab CI/CD | Jenkins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Cloud | Cloud + Self-host | Self-host |
| Language | YAML | YAML | Groovy |
| Difficulty | Easy | Medium | Advanced |
| Integration | GitHub | GitLab | Universal |
| Test Artifacts | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Scalability | High | High | Very High |
📁 Public Example Repository
Example structure:
/src
/tests
.github/workflows/ci.yml
.gitlab-ci.yml
Jenkinsfile
README.md
You can publish it as:
https://github.com/dennisdhm7/ci-testing-demo
🧩 Key Takeaways
- GitHub Actions is the easiest for cloud-native projects.
- GitLab CI/CD provides an all-in-one DevOps solution.
- Jenkins offers powerful customization for enterprise environments.
- All three support automated testing inside CI/CD pipelines.
Automating tests ensures consistent, reliable, and high-quality software delivery.
📺 Video: Testing Management Tools Guide
📦 View GitHub Repository
✍️ Author
Christian Dennis Hinojosa Mucho
Systems Engineering student — UPT
Top comments (1)
It's an interesting article; its content is useful, educational, and practice-oriented, ideal for both developers starting out in DevOps and teams looking to optimize their automated testing workflow. Additionally, you could include an extra example with parallel tests or build arrays, which would show how these pipelines scale in more complex scenarios. But as far as I'm concerned, everything is fine, keep it up.