Every frontend project lately seems to start with the same sentence:
“We’re thinking about adding AI.”
Cool. But why?
After building real products that integrate AI, here’s the hot take I’ve landed on:
AI doesn’t make a product valuable. It only amplifies what’s already there.
If the product is weak, AI just makes that more obvious.
We’re in this phase where people are trying to build AI-first tools, and most of them feel backwards. The UI is vague. The workflows are unclear. The value prop is “trust the model.” And once the novelty wears off, users are left wondering what problem the tool actually solved.
That’s not a model issue. That’s a product issue.
The Best Products Don’t Need AI to Make Sense
Here’s something I’ve noticed working on frontend-heavy apps:
If your product needs AI to be useful, it probably isn’t ready.
The strongest products I’ve worked on already had clear value before AI ever touched them. Users understood what the app did. They knew where to click. They knew what success looked like.
When AI showed up, it didn’t replace the experience. It just smoothed it out.
Less friction. Less typing. Faster feedback. Better suggestions.
That’s it.
No magic. No “ask anything.” No black box UI where the user hopes the model guesses right.
Frontend Engineers Feel Bad AI Immediately
Bad AI integrations show up in the UI first.
You see it when the interface turns into a single text box with a vague prompt. You see it when the app can’t explain what just happened. You see it when the user doesn’t know whether to trust the output or double-check everything.
That’s not empowering. That’s stressful.
Good frontend design is about clarity. Predictable states. Intentional flows. AI works best when it stays inside those boundaries.
When AI becomes the assistant, not the decision-maker, the UI stays grounded. The user stays in control. And the product feels reliable instead of experimental.
AI Should Reduce Work, Not Responsibility
This is the line I don’t like seeing crossed.
AI is great at speeding things up. It’s great at drafting, summarizing, suggesting, and filling in gaps. What it’s not great at is owning outcomes.
The best use cases I’ve seen don’t ask AI to do the job. They ask it to help the user do the job faster.
That distinction matters.
Users don’t want a product that thinks for them. They want one that respects their time.
The Real Winners Are the “Boring” Products
Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
The tools people rely on every day are rarely exciting.
They’re consistent. Predictable. Clear. They do one thing well.
AI doesn’t replace that foundation. It sweetens it.
The products that will last aren’t the ones screaming about intelligence. They’re the ones quietly using AI to remove friction from workflows that already work.
As builders, especially on the frontend, our job isn’t to chase hype. It’s to ship products people trust.
AI is just another tool in that toolbox. A powerful one, sure. But still just a tool.
If AI makes the experience clearer, faster, or smoother, it belongs.
If it makes the product harder to understand, it doesn’t.
Simple as that.
Top comments (0)