The $4,200 Mistake
I once left a staging environment running on AWS for 6 months.
Cost: $4,200
Traffic: 0
Users: 0
Value: 0
Just... existing. Racking up charges. Living its best life.
When I finally discovered it, I felt like I'd been paying rent for an apartment I forgot I had. 🤡
The Problem with AWS Cost Management
AWS Cost Explorer is powerful, but it's not designed to find waste. It shows you:
- What you're spending
- Where you're spending it
- How spending trends over time
But it doesn't tell you:
- Which resources are doing nothing
- Which resources you forgot about
- Which resources are over-provisioned
- Where you're wasting money
What I Built
I just shipped AI-Powered Waste Detection for CloudWise.
It scans your AWS account and finds:
1. Orphaned Resources
- RDS databases with zero connections
- EBS volumes attached to nothing
- Elastic IPs not attached to instances
- Load balancers serving zero traffic
2. Idle Resources
- EC2 instances with <5% CPU usage
- RDS databases with zero queries
- NAT Gateways with zero traffic
- ELBs with zero requests
3. Over-Provisioned Resources
- t3.2xlarge instances running cron jobs
- RDS instances with 90%+ free storage
- EC2 instances with excessive memory
- Lambda functions with over-allocated memory
4. Cost Black Holes
- Cross-AZ data transfer fees
- S3 buckets in expensive storage classes
- Old EBS snapshots
- Unused Elastic IPs
How It Works
- Connect your AWS account (read-only IAM role, takes 2 minutes)
- AI scans your resources (analyzes usage patterns, costs, configurations)
- Get step-by-step recommendations (exactly what to do to fix each issue)
Example Output
🚨 Orphaned RDS Database Detected
Resource: prod-staging-db Cost: $247.32/month Last Connection: 187 days ago Status: Running but unused
Recommendation:
Take final snapshot
Delete database
Estimated savings: $247.32/month ($2,967.84/year)
Risk Level: Low (no connections in 6 months)
Technical Implementation
Stack:
- Frontend: React + TypeScript + TailwindCSS
- Backend: Python + FastAPI
- Database: PostgreSQL
- AI: OpenAI GPT-4 for recommendation generation
- AWS Integration: Boto3 + Cost Explorer API
Key Challenges:
- IAM permissions - Balancing security with functionality
- Cost attribution - Mapping resources to actual costs
- Usage pattern detection - Distinguishing idle from low-usage
- Recommendation quality - Avoiding false positives
What I Learned
1. Most AWS Waste is Obvious (Once You Look)
- 70% of waste is orphaned or idle resources
- 20% is over-provisioning
- 10% is configuration issues (cross-AZ, storage classes)
2. The Problem Isn't Finding Waste, It's Looking
- AWS Cost Explorer is intimidating
- People avoid looking at their bills
- "Out of sight, out of mind" mentality
3. Step-by-Step Instructions Matter
- Knowing you have waste isn't enough
- People need exact steps to fix it
- Reducing friction = higher action rate
Results So Far
In my own AWS account:
- Total waste found: $4,247/month
- Orphaned resources: $1,847/month (RDS, EBS, ELB)
- Idle resources: $1,200/month (EC2, RDS)
- Over-provisioning: $800/month (EC2, Lambda)
- Cross-AZ transfer: $400/month
Try It Yourself
I just launched this publicly today.
Try CloudWise: https://cloudcostwise.io
Free to use, no credit card required. Takes 2 minutes to connect your AWS account.
Would love your feedback, especially from DevOps engineers and platform teams!
What's Next
Coming soon:
- Per-namespace cost tracking for Kubernetes/EKS
- Automated remediation (with approval)
- Slack/Teams alerts for cost anomalies
- Multi-account support for organizations
Have you ever found unexpected AWS waste? Share your horror stories in the comments! 👇
P.S. That $4,200 staging environment? I could've bought a really nice espresso machine instead. Still thinking about it. ☕
Top comments (0)