When a consumer group is configured to listen to multiple topics instead of a single topic, several significant impacts emerge that can affect both performance and operational complexity. Understanding these impacts is crucial for making informed architectural decisions, especially in the context of the Camunda Kafka consumer issues you've been addressing.
Performance and Resource Impacts
Increased Load on Kafka Brokers
Using consumer groups to listen to multiple topics generates higher load on the Kafka cluster[1]. This is particularly problematic when topics have high message rates, as consumers must handle the combined throughput from all subscribed topics simultaneously. The additional load can be addressed through horizontal scaling (adding more brokers) and hardware optimization, but this increases infrastructure costs[1].
Rebalancing Complexity
Consumer group rebalancing becomes significantly more complex when multiple topics are involved. Each time a consumer joins or leaves the group, Kafka must redistribute partition assignments across all topics subscribed by the group[2]. This creates longer rebalancing periods and more frequent disruptions to message processing.
Network Utilization Impact
Multiple consumer groups reading from the same topics create increased network utilization due to duplicate data transmission[3]. While this doesn't significantly affect Kafka broker performance (since data is typically served from memory), it does impact outgoing network traffic, especially when you have many consumer groups.
Operational and Management Challenges
Offset Management Complications
One of the most critical issues is offset management across multiple topics[2]. When you need to reset offsets for one topic within a consumer group, Kafka forces you to stop consumption from all topics in that group. This creates significant operational pain and can cause service disruptions across multiple business processes.
Consumer Assignment Distribution
With multiple topics in a single consumer group, partition assignment becomes unbalanced. Kafka assigns partitions from all subscribed topics to available consumers, which can lead to some consumers being overwhelmed while others remain underutilized. This is especially problematic when topics have different message rates or processing requirements.
Error Propagation
When a consumer group listens to multiple topics, failures in processing one topic can affect others[4]. If one consumer frequently fails due to issues with a specific topic, the entire group enters rebalance mode, delaying message consumption from all other topics.
Architectural Considerations
Message Ordering Implications
While Kafka maintains message ordering within individual partitions, when a consumer group processes multiple topics, ordering guarantees become limited to individual topic-partition combinations. Cross-topic message ordering is not maintained unless topics share the same partitioning scheme and key strategy[5].
Correlation and Processing Logic
Managing correlation between messages from different topics becomes more complex. Your consumer logic must handle different message formats, schemas, and processing requirements within a single consumer instance, increasing code complexity and reducing maintainability[6].
Best Practice Recommendations
Use Single-Topic Consumer Groups
The recommended pattern is to follow "one topic per consumer group"[2]. This approach:
- Eliminates cross-topic rebalancing issues
- Provides independent offset management
- Allows for topic-specific scaling and error handling
- Reduces operational complexity
When Multi-Topic Consumption Makes Sense
Multi-topic consumption is justified primarily in these scenarios[5]:
- Data aggregation where you need to join or correlate events from related topics with the same partitioning scheme
- Sequential processing requirements where business logic demands processing messages from multiple topics in a specific order
- Resource optimization in environments with strict connection limits
[1] https://dattell.com/data-architecture-blog/kafka-consumers-listen-to-multiple-topics/
[2] https://community.zenduty.com/t/pros-and-cons-of-having-multiple-topics-vs-one-topic-per-consumer-group/738
[3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35296317/does-the-number-of-consumer-groups-impact-kafka-performance
[4] https://forum.confluent.io/t/using-one-group-id-for-multiple-kafka-topics/4184
[5] https://gist.github.com/5fd10d8041aeaf733d3acfbd61f6bbef
[6] https://www.baeldung.com/kafka-subscribe-consumer-multiple-topics
[7] https://www.reddit.com/r/apachekafka/comments/16lzlih/in_apache_kafka_if_you_have_2_partitions_and_2/
[8] https://codemia.io/knowledge-hub/path/one_kafka_consumer_for_multiple_topics_vs_one_consumer_for_each_topicpartition
[9] https://www.reddit.com/r/apachekafka/comments/11xf9lu/is_there_a_good_use_case_for_having_a_single/
[10] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Support-Questions/Can-I-use-same-consumer-group-Id-for-two-different-topic/m-p/229885
[11] https://www.groundcover.com/blog/kafka-slow-consumer
[12] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71413357/individual-kafka-consumer-group-behavior-when-listening-to-multiple-topic
[13] https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/kafka-parallel-consumer-part-1/
[14] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57753211/kafka-use-common-consumer-group-to-access-multiple-topics
[15] https://developer.confluent.io/courses/architecture/consumer-group-protocol/
[16] https://learn.conduktor.io/kafka/kafka-consumer-groups-and-consumer-offsets/
[17] https://www.redpanda.com/guides/kafka-performance-kafka-rebalancing
[18] https://dev.to/joseboretto/how-to-join-multiple-kafka-topics-overview-19j8
[19] https://codemia.io/knowledge-hub/path/kafka_multiple_topic_consume
Top comments (0)