Hey dev.to community,
As full-stack developers, we often obsess over state management. Whether it's Redux, Vuex, or Context API, managing the "truth" of a complex application is half the battle.
I recently found myself working on two very different projects simultaneously: a data-heavy fantasy football analysis web app and a browser-based turn-based tactical puzzle game. Switching between the two highlighted a fascinating divergence in how we handle state depending on the domain.
It comes down to this: Are you managing reactive data or rigid behavior?
The Web App: Managing Reactive Data Sprawl
In a typical web application, state is usually about data propagation.
Think about a complex form where changing a dropdown menu needs to fetch new data, validate three other fields, and update a summary chart instantly. The challenge here is ensuring that a change in one piece of data ripples correctly throughout the entire UI tree without causing infinite loops or stale renders.
We use reactive patterns because the user can interact with inputs in almost any order. The state is a snapshot of what the data is right now.
The Game Logic: Enforcing Rigid Behavior Sequences
Game logic, particularly in turn-based strategy, requires a completely different mindset. You aren't just reacting to data changes; you are enforcing strict rules of engagement.
You cannot allow a player to move a unit while an attack animation is playing. You cannot let the enemy AI think before the player has ended their turn.
For this, reactive UI patterns can feel like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Instead, the best tool is often the humble Finite State Machine (FSM).
In my tactical grid game, the game engine exists in discrete states: Init -> PlayerInput -> ActionProcessing -> EnemyAI -> TurnEndCheck -> back to PlayerInput.
The system cannot be in two states at once. Inputs that are valid in PlayerInput state (like clicking a tile to move) are completely ignored in ActionProcessing state. This rigidity is a feature, not a bug. It prevents race conditions and logic breaks that ruin the gameplay experience.
The Right Tool for the Job
It’s tempting to use the hammer you know for every nail. But realizing that my game needed strict state transitions (FSMs) rather than just reactive data binding was a huge breakthrough in stabilizing the codebase.
Next time you are struggling with complex state, ask yourself: Do I need my UI to react to changing data, or do I need my system to adhere to a strict sequence of behaviors? The answer will dictate your architecture.
Top comments (0)