Security rarely breaks all at once. In SaaS products, it usually weakens quietly as features grow, releases speed up, and testing struggles to keep pace. Studies consistently show that most web vulnerabilities are introduced during rapid development cycles, not after launch.
In this blog, we’ll share what we learned while securing a Web-to-Print SaaS using automated DAST. It covers where traditional testing fell short, how continuous security testing changed visibility, and the practical lessons that helped us strengthen SaaS security without the pace of new development.
Why We Had to Rethink Security for Our SaaS Product
As our SaaS product matured, security stopped being a background task and became a real concern. The platform was growing. Features were shipping faster. Customer usage was increasing. And the application itself was becoming more complex with every release. At that point, relying on periodic checks no longer felt enough.
We were dealing with a Web-to-Print SaaS, which meant constant interaction with user inputs, file handling, authentication flows, and dynamic workflows. Any missed issue could directly impact customer trust. Security needed to move at the same pace as development.
What triggered the rethink wasn’t a single incident, but a pattern we couldn’t ignore:
- Releases were happening frequently
- Manual testing couldn’t scale with every change
- Security visibility dropped between deployments
- Some issues surfaced late, when fixes were costlier
We also realized that security was too reactive. Problems were often found after features were live, not while they were being built or tested. That gap was risky for a SaaS product exposed to the internet every day.
What Security Looked Like Before Automated DAST
Before we integrated automation, our security process was largely a manual process. For a feature-rich platform handling extensive user inputs across thousands of pages, relying on human eyes alone created a significant gap. We were essentially trying to secure a moving target, where every new feature added more complexity to an already broad attack surface.
During this phase, our security posture was defined by these specific hurdles:
- Validation relied heavily on time-consuming manual reviews that were difficult to perform consistently at scale.
- Detecting client-side vulnerabilities across numerous forms and input parameters was a major challenge.
- Security checks were only loosely tied to our release cycles, often leading to timing gaps.
- There was a constant, underlying uncertainty regarding which risks might still exist in the production environment.
- Leadership lacked a clear, centralized view of the platform’s security posture prior to major deployments.
Over time, the manual approach became difficult to trust. Security felt reactive rather than structured and ongoing. It was clear that manual processes alone couldn’t keep up with the pace of a modern SaaS product. To move forward, we needed a way to test more consistently, cover real attack paths, and reduce blind spots without increasing manual overhead.
How We Implemented Automated DAST in Web-to-Print SaaS
When we decided to integrate an automated DAST tool into our workflow, the goal was simple: build a security validation layer that works with our release process. We wanted a solution that could keep up with the unique demands of a multi-tenant web-to-print environment.
To make this transition successful, we integrated ZeroThreat.ai directly into our existing release process as a pre-release validation layer. Here is exactly how we structured the implementation:
- Integrated scans into release cycle: Automated DAST was scheduled to run before every major release, giving us insights right when they were most needed.
- Aligned security with workflows: Scanning didn’t require developers to pause or rework their tasks. It fit into the existing process seamlessly.
- Prioritized findings by risk: Vulnerabilities surfaced by DAST were reviewed based on severity. Critical issues were fixed immediately, while less urgent ones were planned into the roadmap.
- Focused on OWASP Top 10 threats: Our scans targeted real attack vectors common in web applications. This helped us identify issues like cross-site scripting (XSS) across pages that were hard to catch manually.
- Brought clarity to engineering and product teams: Findings came with clear context so teams knew not just what was wrong, but how to fix it efficiently.
If you want a complete walkthrough of this implementation, you can checkout Web-to-Print SaaS security case study. It covers how an automated DAST tool fits into the release workflow and what it revealed in real usage.
Measurable Security Improvements We Observed
Once automated DAST became part of our security workflow, the impact was visible within a few release cycles. Security testing stopped being occasional and started becoming consistent. More importantly, the results were no longer based on assumptions. We had real data showing what was exposed, what needed attention, and how security posture was improving over time.
Improved vulnerability detection
- Issues were identified earlier in the release cycle
- Repeated patterns helped highlight systemic weaknesses
- Dynamic and input-heavy areas received better coverage
Better consistency across releases
- Every major release went through the same level of security testing
- Fewer gaps between deployments
- Reduced dependence on manual checks
Faster remediation and clearer ownership
- Findings were easier for developers to understand and act on
- High-risk issues were prioritized and fixed sooner
- Security discussions became more structured and focused
Overall, automated DAST brought predictability to our security efforts. It helped us move from reactive fixes to measurable, continuous improvement without slowing down delivery.
Key Lessons We Took Away From This Experience
Working through this journey changed how we think about application security in a SaaS environment. The biggest lesson was that security cannot be treated as a one-time activity. In fast-moving products, risk evolves with every release, and testing needs to evolve with it. The automated DAST tool helped us see security as an ongoing process rather than a final checkpoint.
A few lessons stood out clearly:
- Consistency matters more than intensity: Running smaller, regular tests proved more effective than occasional deep checks.
- Real attack paths reveal real problems: Testing how users actually interact with the application uncovered issues that manual reviews often missed.
- Security must fit into existing workflows: Any process that slows development will eventually be skipped. Automation works only when it feels natural to teams.
- Actionable findings drive adoption: Clear, prioritized results made it easier for developers to fix issues without friction.
- Visibility builds confidence: Having repeatable insights into security posture reduced uncertainty around releases.
This experience reinforced that strong SaaS security isn’t about adding more tools or steps. It’s about building security into how software is shipped every day. Automated DAST didn’t replace manual thinking, but it gave us a reliable foundation to make better security decisions with each release.
Final Thoughts on Securing SaaS with Automated DAST
Securing a SaaS product taught us that security cannot be separated from how software is built and shipped. Manual checks alone could not keep up with frequent releases. Automated DAST helped us gain consistent visibility, catch real issues early, and reduce security gaps across deployments.
More importantly, this experience showed that effective SaaS security is about balance. Testing must reflect real user behavior, fit naturally into workflows, and provide actionable insights. When security becomes continuous and predictable, teams can ship faster with certainty of safety.
Top comments (0)