I recently watched NetworkChuck's breakdown of Prompt Engineering. It is arguably the most pragmatic tutorial I've seen on the subject. The concepts in the video overlap heavily with my own practical experience; it really articulates the structured approach I've been using.
🎥 Video Source: You suck at prompting (it's not AI's fault)
The Meta-Skill: Clarity of Thought
The part that struck me the most was that it doesn't talk about "magic spells," but goes straight to the core:
"The Meta-Skill of Prompting is actually Clarity of Thought."
The video mentions a harsh but true concept: if the AI gives garbage results, it's usually not that the AI is "dumb," but rather a Skill Issue on the user's part. If we cannot express logically and clearly what we want, the AI cannot output good results.
"Think first, prompt second." — This is my favorite quote from the video.
7 Key Prompting Techniques
Here are my notes on the 7 practical prompting frameworks mentioned in the video:
1. Persona
Explicitly define the AI's identity (e.g., Senior SRE Engineer). This allows it to access specific Domain Knowledge rather than answering with a default, generic tone.
2. Context
Context is King. This is the key to reducing Hallucinations. I've found that providing detailed facts and the current situation significantly prevents the AI from "making things up."
3. Format
Beyond content, clearly specifying the output format (e.g., JSON, Markdown) drastically improves usability. This is an often overlooked technique.
4. Chain of Thought (CoT)
Ask the AI to "Think step-by-step." This not only improves logical accuracy but also allows us to see the AI's reasoning path, making it easier to debug.
5. Few-Shot Prompting
Instead of using fancy adjectives to describe a style, just give the AI a few perfect examples of Input/Output (Pattern Matching). This usually yields the best results.
6. Tree of Thoughts (ToT)
For complex decisions, require the AI to develop multiple branches of thought simultaneously and self-evaluate, rather than relying on a linear, gut reaction.
7. The Playoff Method
This is an advanced adversarial validation technique. Create opposing AI roles (e.g., Engineer writing a draft vs. Angry Customer critiquing it) to debate and revise. The synthesized result is often much more rigorous than a single perspective.
[中文筆記] 提示工程的本質：不是魔法，是邏輯
剛剛看了 NetworkChuck 解析 Prompt Engineering 的影片，這應該是我近期看過最務實（Pragmatic）的教學。影片裡的觀點，與我自己在實戰中累積的經驗高度重疊；這些觀念剛好幫我把過去的實作心得，用很清晰的架構講了出來。
核心觀念：清晰的思考
其中最打動我的一點，是它不談什麼魔法咒語，而是直指核心：
「Prompting 的 Meta-Skill，其實就是 Clarity of Thought (清晰的思考)。」
影片裡提到一個很殘酷但真實的觀念：如果 AI 給出的結果很爛，這通常不是 AI 變笨了，而是使用者的 Skill Issue。如果我們連自己想要什麼都無法邏輯清晰地表達，AI 自然也就無法給出好的 output。
"Think first, prompt second." —— 這是整支影片我最喜歡的一句話。
7 個實用的提示詞技巧
影片裡提到了 7 個實用的 Prompting 架構，筆記如下：
Persona (角色設定)
明確定義 AI 的身份（例如：Senior SRE Engineer），讓它能精準調用該領域的 Domain Knowledge，而不是用預設的通用語氣回答。Context (上下文脈絡)
Context is King. 這是減少 Hallucination (幻覺) 的關鍵。我發現提供越詳細的事實與現況背景，AI 就越不容易「瞎掰」。Format (輸出格式)
除了內容，明確規範輸出的形式（JSON,Markdown）其實能大幅提升回應的可用性，這點很容易被忽略。Chain of Thought (CoT, 思維鏈)
要求 AI "Think step-by-step"。這不只能提升邏輯準確率，也能讓我們清楚看到 AI 的推理路徑，方便除錯。Few-Shot Prompting (少樣本提示)
與其用文字花式描述想要的風格，不如直接給它幾個 Input/Output 的完美範例（Pattern Matching），效果通常最好。Tree of Thoughts (ToT, 思維樹)
面對複雜決策時，要求 AI 同時發展多種思考路徑（Branches）並自我評估，而不是單線性的直覺反應。The Playoff Method (對抗驗證)
這是進階的對抗驗證技巧。創造對立的 AI 角色（例如：Engineer提案 vs.Angry Customer批判），透過多輪辯證與修正，產出比單一視角更嚴謹的結果。
Top comments (0)