Why Annual Appraisals Are Killing Your Team

Walked into a client's office in Geelong last month and there it was - that familiar sight that makes my skin crawl. Thirty-seven performance review forms stacked on the HR manager's desk like a monument to corporate delusion. Each one a masterpiece of bureaucratic theatre, complete with numerical ratings for "cultural alignment" and "synergy contribution."
I've been in the people development game for over 16 years now, and I'm going to say something that'll probably get me uninvited from a few corporate Christmas parties: annual performance reviews are the biggest waste of time in modern business. Full stop.
The Performance Review Industrial Complex
Here's what really gets under my skin - we've built this entire industry around the idea that you can capture someone's contribution, growth potential, and development needs in a two-hour meeting once a year. It's like trying to understand someone's health by taking their temperature in January and ignoring everything that happens until December.
But everyone keeps doing it because, well, that's how it's always been done. Classic corporate logic.
I remember this brilliant software developer I worked with in Perth - let's call him Jake. Jake had completely revolutionised his team's deployment process in March, mentored two junior developers through major projects in June, and single-handedly prevented a massive system failure in September. Absolute legend.
His annual review in November? "Meets expectations." Why? Because back in February, he'd missed a couple of deadlines while dealing with a family crisis. That's what was fresh in his manager's mind.
Meanwhile, his colleague who'd been coasting all year but delivered one decent project in October got "exceeds expectations." The whole thing was a joke, and Jake knew it.
Why Traditional Reviews Are Fundamentally Broken
The research backs up what anyone with half a brain can see - annual performance reviews don't improve performance. A study from Melbourne Business School found that 67% of employees report feeling more demotivated after their annual review than before it.
Think about it logically. How much do you remember about what you did in January? How accurately can you assess someone's performance from 8-10 months ago? How useful is feedback that's six months too late?
It's like giving someone directions to a destination they reached half a year ago. Completely pointless.
But here's the kicker - most managers hate doing them just as much as employees hate receiving them. I've sat through hundreds of these things, and the number of times I've seen a manager genuinely excited about performance review season? Zero.
The dirty secret nobody talks about: most performance reviews are written the week before the meeting. Managers scramble through old emails, trying to remember what the person actually did all year. They Google "performance review phrases" at 11 PM the night before. They make up numerical scores because the system demands them.
And we wonder why employee engagement is in the toilet.
website :
https://opportunitylocal.bigcartel.com/product/managing-workplace-anxiety-adelaide