π οΈ Mastering .NET Design Patterns & SOLID Principles: A Comprehensive Guide for Developers
A deep dive into essential .NET design patterns and SOLID principles to help you build clean, scalable, and maintainable applications.
π Table of Contents
- What Are Design Patterns?
- Why Use Design Patterns in .NET
- Creational Patterns
- Structural Patterns
- Behavioral Patterns
- Domain-Specific Patterns
- SOLID Principles in .NET
- Tips for Choosing the Right Pattern
- Why Choose .NET Design Patterns
- Common Mistakes & Pitfalls
- FAQs
- Key Takeaways
- Final Thoughts
π What Are Design Patterns?
Design patterns are time-tested, language-agnostic solutions to common software design problems. They help structure code to be more reusable, readable, and easier to maintain.
π€ Why Use Design Patterns in .NET
- β Enhances readability & team collaboration
- β Promotes scalability and modularity
- β Improves testability and reduces bugs
- β Supports cleaner, layered architectures
π§± Creational Patterns
Singleton
public sealed class Logger {
private static readonly Lazy<Logger> _instance = new(() => new Logger());
public static Logger Instance => _instance.Value;
private Logger() { }
public void Log(string msg) => Console.WriteLine(msg);
}
Use when: Only one global instance should exist.
Factory Method
public interface IButton { void Render(); }
public class WindowsButton : IButton { public void Render() => Console.WriteLine("Windows Button"); }
public abstract class Dialog {
public abstract IButton CreateButton();
public void RenderWindow() {
var btn = CreateButton();
btn.Render();
}
}
public class WindowsDialog : Dialog {
public override IButton CreateButton() => new WindowsButton();
}
Use when: You need polymorphic object creation.
π Abstract Factory
Create families of related objects without specifying their concrete classes.
/
/ Abstract product interfaces
public interface IButton { void Render(); }
public interface ICheckbox { void Check(); }
// Concrete products
public class MacButton : IButton { public void Render() => Console.WriteLine("Render Mac Button"); }
public class MacCheckbox : ICheckbox { public void Check() => Console.WriteLine("Check Mac Checkbox"); }
public class WinButton : IButton { public void Render() => Console.WriteLine("Render Windows Button"); }
public class WinCheckbox : ICheckbox { public void Check() => Console.WriteLine("Check Windows Checkbox"); }
// Abstract factory
public interface IGUIFactory {
IButton CreateButton();
ICheckbox CreateCheckbox();
}
// Concrete factories
public class MacFactory : IGUIFactory {
public IButton CreateButton() => new MacButton();
public ICheckbox CreateCheckbox() => new MacCheckbox();
}
public class WinFactory : IGUIFactory {
public IButton CreateButton() => new WinButton();
public ICheckbox CreateCheckbox() => new WinCheckbox();
}
// Client
public class Application {
private IButton _button;
private ICheckbox _checkbox;
public Application(IGUIFactory factory) {
_button = factory.CreateButton();
_checkbox = factory.CreateCheckbox();
}
public void Render() {
_button.Render();
_checkbox.Check();
}
}
Use when: You want to ensure products from the same family are used together (like UI themes).
ποΈ Builder
Construct a complex object step by step. Allows different representations of the same construction process.
public class Car {
public string Engine { get; set; }
public int Wheels { get; set; }
public string Color { get; set; }
}
// Builder interface
public interface ICarBuilder {
void BuildEngine();
void BuildWheels();
void Paint();
Car GetCar();
}
// Concrete builder
public class SportsCarBuilder : ICarBuilder {
private Car _car = new();
public void BuildEngine() => _car.Engine = "V8";
public void BuildWheels() => _car.Wheels = 4;
public void Paint() => _car.Color = "Red";
public Car GetCar() => _car;
}
// Director
public class CarDirector {
public Car Construct(ICarBuilder builder) {
builder.BuildEngine();
builder.BuildWheels();
builder.Paint();
return builder.GetCar();
}
}
Use when: Objects require step-by-step customization or configuration (e.g., building HTML, reports, or cars).
𧬠Prototype
Create new objects by copying an existing object (a prototype), rather than instantiating a new one.
public abstract class Shape : ICloneable {
public int X { get; set; }
public int Y { get; set; }
public abstract object Clone();
}
public class Circle : Shape {
public int Radius { get; set; }
public override object Clone() {
return this.MemberwiseClone(); // Shallow copy
}
}
// Usage
var original = new Circle { X = 10, Y = 20, Radius = 15 };
var copy = (Circle)original.Clone();
Console.WriteLine($"Copy: X={copy.X}, Y={copy.Y}, Radius={copy.Radius}");
Use when: Object creation is expensive or complex. Ideal for caching and cloning.
π§± Structural Patterns
Adapter
public interface ITarget { void Request(); }
class Adaptee { public void SpecificRequest() => Console.WriteLine("Specific Request"); }
class Adapter : ITarget {
private Adaptee _adaptee = new();
public void Request() => _adaptee.SpecificRequest();
}
π§ Behavioral Patterns
Strategy
public interface ICompression { void Compress(string file); }
public class ZipCompression : ICompression {
public void Compress(string file) => Console.WriteLine("Compressing using ZIP");
}
public class CompressionContext {
private ICompression _strategy;
public void SetStrategy(ICompression s) => _strategy = s;
public void Compress(string file) => _strategy.Compress(file);
}
ποΈ Domain-Specific Patterns
Repository Pattern for abstracting database logic
Unit of Work to coordinate transactional changes
MVC & MVVM for UI separation in ASP.NET, WPF, Blazor
π SOLID Principles in .NET
S - Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
A class should have only one reason to change.
O - Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Open for extension, closed for modification.
L - Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Subtypes must be substitutable for base types.
I - Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Prefer many client-specific interfaces.
D - Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Depend on abstractions, not concrete implementations.
π‘ Tips for Choosing Patterns
Start simple, refactor into patterns when needed
Combine patterns with SOLID principles
Use interfaces for better testability
Profile your application to avoid premature optimization
π** Why Choose .NET Design Patterns**
Native support in frameworks (DI, async/await, interfaces)
Better architecture with less technical debt
Accelerated development in teams and enterprises
β οΈ** Common Mistakes**
Mistake Solution
Overusing Singleton Use Dependency Injection wisely
Poor abstractions Follow Interface Segregation & DIP
Not testing patterns Ensure unit/integration test coverage
β FAQs
Q: Should I combine patterns?
A: Yes, often used together (e.g., Repository + Unit of Work).
Q: Are patterns overkill for small apps?
A: Use only where necessary to avoid complexity.
β
Key Takeaways
SOLID + Design Patterns = Clean Architecture
Use patterns thoughtfully, not forcefully
Invest in learning patterns gradually over time
π―** Final Thoughts**
.NET developers who understand and apply design patterns along with SOLID principles write code that stands the test of time. This guide is your step toward crafting enterprise-ready software.
If you found this useful, leave a β€οΈ or comment with your favorite pattern!
Top comments (0)