DEV Community

Michael Lip
Michael Lip

Posted on • Originally published at zovo.one

APA Citations Are Broken and Everyone Gets Them Wrong

I spent four years in university watching classmates lose points on papers not because their arguments were weak, but because their citations were formatted wrong. The hanging indent was missing. The ampersand should have been "and." The DOI was formatted as a URL when it shouldn't have been. APA citation style is one of those things that looks simple until you actually sit down and try to get every detail right.

The American Psychological Association published the 7th edition of its style manual in 2019, and it changed enough rules to invalidate most of what people learned from the 6th edition. If you're still formatting citations the way you learned five years ago, you're probably doing it wrong.

What actually changed in APA 7th edition

The biggest shifts are ones people miss because they seem small.

DOIs are now full URLs. In APA 6, you wrote doi:10.1037/a0028240. In APA 7, you write https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028240. Every single DOI is formatted as a clickable link. This one change invalidates millions of existing bibliographies.

No more "Retrieved from" for most online sources. APA 6 required "Retrieved from https://..." for websites. APA 7 drops the "Retrieved from" phrasing for anything with a stable URL. You only include "Retrieved [date]" when the content is designed to change, like a social media profile or a wiki page.

Publisher location is gone. You used to write "New York, NY: Publisher Name." Now it's just "Publisher Name." The location field was dropped entirely for books.

Up to 20 authors before truncating. APA 6 cut off at 7 authors and inserted an ellipsis. APA 7 lists up to 20 authors. This affects a lot of scientific papers with large research teams.

The anatomy of a reference entry

Every APA reference follows the same four-element structure: Author, Date, Title, Source. The order never changes. What changes is how each element is formatted depending on the source type.

For a journal article:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (2024). Title of the article in
    sentence case. Journal Name in Title Case and Italics,
    Volume(Issue), Page-Page. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For a book:

Author, A. A. (2024). Title of the book in sentence case and
    italics. Publisher Name.
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For a website:

Author, A. A. (2024, March 15). Title of the page in sentence
    case and italics. Site Name. https://www.example.com/page
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Notice the patterns. Last name first, then initials. Always a period after each of the four elements. Sentence case for article and book titles (only capitalize the first word and proper nouns). Title case for journal names. Italics on specific things depending on source type.

Five mistakes I see constantly

1. Title case where sentence case belongs. Article titles and book titles use sentence case. "The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Cognitive Function" is wrong. "The effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive function" is correct. The only exception is proper nouns and the first word after a colon.

2. Forgetting the hanging indent. Every reference entry uses a hanging indent: the first line is flush left, and subsequent lines are indented 0.5 inches. This is a formatting rule, not a content rule, but it's the first thing that gets flagged on papers. In Word, you set this under Paragraph > Special > Hanging. In Google Docs, it's the same path. In LaTeX, \begin{hangparas}{0.5in}{1} or use biblatex which handles it automatically.

3. Mixing up "and" and "&". In the reference list, you use an ampersand: Smith, J., & Jones, K. In the body of your paper (narrative citations), you spell it out: "Smith and Jones (2024) found that..." This is a distinction people get backwards constantly.

4. Missing the period after the DOI. There is no period after a DOI or URL at the end of a reference entry. This changed from APA 6, where the convention was ambiguous. APA 7 is explicit: do not put a period after a URL because it might be interpreted as part of the URL.

Actually, let me correct that -- I've seen conflicting guidance on this, which is itself proof of how confusing APA formatting is. The APA 7 manual says URLs and DOIs at the end of a reference are not followed by a period. But some style checkers flag the missing period. When the style guide itself creates confusion, you know the system has problems.

5. Using "et al." too early. For works with one or two authors, always list all authors in every citation. For three or more authors, use "et al." from the first citation. APA 6 had different rules for first and subsequent citations with three to five authors. APA 7 simplified this: three or more means "et al." every time.

In-text citations are their own minefield

There are two forms: parenthetical and narrative.

Parenthetical: (Smith, 2024) or (Smith & Jones, 2024, p. 42)

Narrative: Smith (2024) argued that... or Smith and Jones (2024) demonstrated...

Page numbers are required for direct quotes and recommended for paraphrases. The abbreviation is p. for a single page and pp. for a range: (Smith, 2024, pp. 42-48).

When you cite multiple sources in the same parenthetical, separate them with semicolons and order them alphabetically: (Adams, 2020; Baker, 2019; Carter, 2021). Not chronologically. Alphabetically by first author's last name.

Why this matters beyond school

APA style isn't just academic busywork. It's a system designed so readers can find your sources. A properly formatted citation tells someone exactly where to look: which author, which year, which journal, which page. When citations are wrong, that chain breaks. In fields like psychology and medicine, where replication depends on being able to find and verify sources, broken citations are a real problem.

It's also a credibility signal. Reviewers and editors notice when your reference list is sloppy. It doesn't matter if your research is solid -- inconsistent formatting suggests carelessness, and that impression bleeds into how people evaluate your work.

Automating what should be automated

Manually formatting citations is a waste of time. The rules are deterministic -- given a source type and its metadata, the output format is completely specified. This is exactly the kind of task that should be handled by software. Tools like Zotero and Mendeley help, but they require setup and sometimes get the format wrong anyway.

For quick, one-off citation generation, I built an APA source generator at zovo.one/free-tools/apa-source-generator that takes your source details and outputs properly formatted 7th edition references you can paste directly into your paper.

The goal isn't to avoid learning the format -- you should understand how APA citations work so you can spot errors. The goal is to stop spending twenty minutes double-checking whether the comma goes before or after the ampersand.


I'm Michael Lip. I build free developer tools at zovo.one. 350+ tools, all private, all free.

Top comments (0)