DEV Community

Mike Hanol
Mike Hanol

Posted on

Why Your AI Coding Assistant Needs a Security Layer (And How to Add One in 2 Minutes)

The npm ecosystem just experienced its largest supply chain attack ever. Here's what it means for AI-assisted development—and what you can do about it.

The Wake-Up Call: September 2025

On September 8, 2025, attackers compromised 18 npm packages with 2.6 billion weekly downloads—including foundational libraries like chalk, debug, and ansi-styles. Within just 2 hours, malicious code had reached 10% of all cloud environments.

The attack vector? A phishing email to a single maintainer.
The payload? Cryptocurrency-stealing malware injected into packages that exist in virtually every JavaScript project.

But here's what makes this story different: by November 2025, a second wave hit—Shai-Hulud 2.0—compromising over 700 packages and 25,000 GitHub repositories. This time, the malware included a destructive fallback: if it couldn't steal your credentials, it would attempt to delete your entire home directory.

CISA issued an advisory. The Singapore Cyber Security Agency issued alerts. And developers everywhere asked the same question: How do we prevent this from happening again?

The AI Amplification Problem

Here's the part that keeps me up at night.

97% of enterprise developers now use AI coding assistants like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude. These tools generate millions of dependency selections daily. They know what a package does—but they have no idea whether it's safe.

Consider what happened in March 2025: security researchers discovered the "Rules File Backdoor" vulnerability affecting both GitHub Copilot and Cursor. Attackers could manipulate AI assistants into generating malicious code that appeared completely legitimate. The AI itself became the attack vector.

The numbers are sobering:

  • 36% of AI-generated code suggestions contain security vulnerabilities (Stanford/NYU research)
  • 6.4% of repositories using Copilot leak secrets—40% higher than the baseline
  • AI tools routinely suggest vulnerable, unmaintained, or compromised packages

We're coding faster than ever. But we're also introducing vulnerabilities faster than ever.

Why Existing Tools Aren't Enough

Traditional security scanners like Snyk, Dependabot, and OSV-Scanner were built for a different era—one where humans reviewed every dependency decision. They:

  • Produce flat CVSS scores divorced from context
  • Average 3-7 days between CVE disclosure and detection
  • Require manual dashboard reviews
  • Don't integrate into AI decision loops

When your AI assistant can suggest 50 packages in a coding session, you need security intelligence that operates at AI speed—sub-3-second decisions, not weekly triage meetings.

A New Approach: Security Intelligence for AI Agents

This is why I built DepsShield—an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that gives AI coding assistants real-time security intelligence.

Instead of scanning after code is written, DepsShield checks packages before your AI suggests them. It's security at the point of decision, not the point of deployment.

How It Works

DepsShield evaluates packages through multiple security dimensions:

  • Vulnerability Detection — Real-time cross-referencing against OSV, GitHub Advisory, and npm audit databases
  • Maintainer Analysis — Flags suspicious maintainer changes, abandoned packages, and typosquatting attempts
  • Supply Chain Integrity — Checks for signs of compromise like the Shai-Hulud attack patterns
  • Risk Scoring — Contextual scoring that goes beyond binary "vulnerable/not vulnerable"

When your AI asks about a package, it gets a response like this:

json{
  "package": "lodash@4.17.20",
  "riskScore": 156,
  "riskLevel": "HIGH",
  "vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "id": "CVE-2020-8203",
      "severity": "HIGH", 
      "title": "Prototype Pollution"
    }
  ],
  "recommendation": "Upgrade to 4.17.21 or use lodash-es"
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Your AI can now make informed decisions—or ask for safer alternatives.

Getting Started (Zero Installation Required)

The entire setup takes about 2 minutes. There's nothing to install—just add DepsShield to your MCP configuration.

For Claude Desktop
Edit your config file:

macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json

Add this configuration:

json{
  "mcpServers": {
    "depsshield": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@depsshield/mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For Cursor
Go to Settings → Features → MCP Servers → Add Server, then use the same configuration.

For Cline/VS Code
Open VS Code Settings → search for "Cline" → MCP Servers, and add the configuration.

That's it. Restart your AI tool, and you're protected.

What's Next

DepsShield currently covers the npm ecosystem—the most attacked package registry in the world. But this is just the beginning.

Expanding Ecosystems:

  • Python (PyPI) — The second most targeted ecosystem
  • Java (Maven) — Enterprise environments need protection too
  • Go modules — Growing ecosystem with increasing attack surface

Deeper Security Intelligence:

The current version focuses on known vulnerabilities and basic package health signals. Future versions will introduce a significantly more comprehensive risk assessment model—one that goes far beyond CVE lookups.

I'm developing a multi-dimensional scoring framework that evaluates packages through lenses that existing tools completely ignore: maintainer trust patterns, dependency graph complexity, behavioral anomalies, and organizational exposure context. The goal is to catch threats like Shai-Hulud before they're publicly known—by identifying the warning signs that precede an attack, not just the signatures that follow one.

Think of it as moving from "is this package vulnerable?" to "should I trust this package?"—a fundamentally different question that requires fundamentally different intelligence.

If you want early access to these capabilities or want to shape what gets built next, sign up on the landing page.

The Bigger Picture

The September 2025 npm attack wasn't an anomaly. Sonatype tracked 16,279 new malicious packages across npm, PyPI, and Maven Central in 2025 alone—a 188% year-over-year increase. The total now exceeds 845,000 known malicious packages.

Supply chain attacks are no longer edge cases. They're a persistent, escalating threat. And as AI accelerates development, it also accelerates the attack surface.

The question isn't whether your dependencies will be targeted. It's whether you'll know before your AI suggests them.

Try It Now

  • 🛡️ Landing Page: depsshield.com
  • 📦 npm Package: @depsshield/mcp-server
  • 💬 Feedback: I'm actively developing this based on user needs. If you have suggestions or want to discuss security for AI coding tools, reach out.

DepsShield is currently in early access, focused on the npm ecosystem. It's free to use and takes 2 minutes to set up. Your AI assistant deserves a security layer—give it one.

Top comments (0)