As developers, we often get excited about complex systems—scalable architectures, clever abstractions, shiny frameworks. But one of the most educational projects I’ve worked on didn’t involve any of that.
It was a free tools website.
- No logins.
- No subscriptions.
- No flashy UI.
Just a collection of small utilities meant to solve everyday problems quickly.
Building and maintaining it taught me more about product thinking, user behavior, and practical engineering than many larger projects ever did.
Choosing What to Build (From a Developer’s Perspective)
When I started, the temptation was to build something “impressive.” Advanced features, multi-purpose tools, lots of options. That instinct didn’t last long.
What worked better was focusing on single-purpose tools, things that do one job well and get out of the way. Calculators, counters, converters, small utilities people don’t think about until they suddenly need them.
From a product standpoint, this reduced decision fatigue for users.
From an engineering standpoint, it reduced surface area for bugs and maintenance.
That combination mattered more than I expected.
The Stack Was Simple — And That Was the Point
The entire platform was built using:
- WordPress as the base
- HTML and CSS for structure and layout
- JavaScript and jQuery for interactions and logic
Nothing exotic. No heavy frameworks layered on top.
WordPress handled content and structure reliably, while custom HTML, CSS, and JavaScript gave me enough control to build tools exactly the way I wanted. jQuery, despite its age, proved useful for quick DOM manipulation and keeping things lightweight.
The key lesson here wasn’t about the tools themselves, but about choosing boring technology on purpose. Fewer dependencies meant fewer things breaking unexpectedly and less time spent chasing updates.
Performance Became a Product Feature
Early on, I noticed something interesting: users didn’t comment on design much, but they reacted strongly—positively or negatively—to speed.
Fast-loading tools kept people around. Slow ones didn’t.
That pushed me to prioritize:
- Minimal scripts
- Clean markup
- Avoiding unnecessary plugins
- Writing JavaScript that did exactly what was needed, nothing more
Over time, maintaining a platform like FreeToolsLand reinforced a simple idea: performance isn’t just a technical concern, it’s part of the user experience.
https://freetoolsland.com/how-online-free-tools-can-help/
What Broke in Real Usage
Some issues never appeared during development but surfaced quickly once real users arrived.
Edge cases I didn’t anticipate.
Inputs people used “wrong.”
Mobile behaviors that felt obvious only after seeing them fail.
None of these problems were complex, but they were revealing. They showed me how differently users think compared to developers. Handling these cases improved both the tools and my own approach to testing.
I stopped assuming “expected usage” and started designing for misuse.
The Tools I Thought Would Shine vs. What Actually Did
One of the biggest surprises was which tools people used most.
I assumed complex utilities would attract more attention. Instead, the simplest ones consistently performed better. Something as basic as a word counter ended up being far more valuable to users than tools I spent significantly more time planning.
https://freetoolsland.com/word-counter/
That changed how I prioritized development. I began focusing less on what felt interesting to build and more on what people actually returned to.
Boring tools, it turns out, are often the most useful.
Maintenance Is the Real Project
Building the first version was the easy part. Maintaining it was where most learning happened.
Updating logic without breaking behavior.
Fixing small bugs that affected real workflows.
Resisting the urge to constantly rewrite things.
Maintenance forced discipline. It encouraged smaller changes, clearer code, and more thoughtful decisions. It also highlighted something developers don’t always like to admit: stability is a feature users value deeply.
What This Project Changed for Me as a Developer
Working on this site shifted my mindset in subtle ways:
- I think more about users before architecture
- I value clarity over cleverness
- I’m more comfortable shipping small improvements consistently
It reminded me that good engineering doesn’t always look impressive from the outside. Sometimes it looks quiet, reliable, and unremarkable—and that’s exactly what users want.
Why Projects Like This Are Worth Doing
If you’re a developer considering a side project, especially one that feels “too simple,” I’d argue that’s a good sign.
Projects like this expose you to real usage patterns, real maintenance problems, and real tradeoffs. They force you to think beyond code and into how people actually interact with what you build.
For me, this free tools website wasn’t about growth or scale. It was about learning how to build things that last—and that lesson has carried over into every other project since.
Top comments (0)