DEV Community

Discussion on: My developer workflow using WSL, tmux and Neovim

Collapse
 
moopet profile image
Ben Sinclair

Bash is great but I personally find it harder to customize.

What is it that you find harder to customise in bash compared to zsh?

Also, what features of exa are you using that aren't present in ls?

Collapse
 
nexxeln profile image
Shoubhit Dash

I may be wrong here but at least in my experience it was easier to install and configure plugins in zsh.

Not just this but zsh has so many other features too!

Collapse
 
moopet profile image
Ben Sinclair

Plugins are handled through a third-party tool (oh-my-zsh or whatever), they're not part of zsh are they? Most shells have those sort of plugin managers these days.

Collapse
 
nexxeln profile image
Shoubhit Dash

exa has a more readable output with colors and icons which you can look at and instantly know the filetypes of different files. It is also noticeably faster than ls.

Collapse
 
moopet profile image
Ben Sinclair

ls supports colours and symbols for file metadata (they're things like / and *, not icons, and they don't differentiate between file types, but I've very rarely been bothered about that. Either a directory is so full you're better off asking ls *.png to dig out the pictures or it's small and organised and you don't need help reading it.

Thread Thread
 
nexxeln profile image
Shoubhit Dash

Whatever works for you!