DEV Community

Cover image for Why Many Companies Fail SOC 2 Type II and How to Avoid the Same Mistakes
Narendrasahoo
Narendrasahoo

Posted on

Why Many Companies Fail SOC 2 Type II and How to Avoid the Same Mistakes

SOC 2 Type II exposes how well your security controls actually work day after day. Type I is the easy part. It tells the world your controls are designed correctly at a specific point in time. Type II proves that those controls were followed consistently over several months. This is where companies run into trouble.

After two decades of working closely with engineering teams, founders, and security leaders across different regions, I have seen a pattern. Most organizations do not fail because SOC 2 is difficult. They fail because they underestimate how operational the Type II audit really is.

If you are preparing for SOC 2 compliance or evaluating whether you should start with Type I or move straight into Type II, understanding these common mistakes will save you painful rework later.

1. Treating Type II as a stretched version of Type I

Many teams believe Type II is just more documentation. It is not.
Type II requires living evidence collected across the entire audit period. Logs, reviews, approvals, monitoring data, onboarding and offboarding trails, and incident handling must all show consistent behavior over time.

How to avoid it

  • Build a routine where every key control runs on schedule.

  • Do not store everything for the end. Type II rewards consistency, not last minute effort.

This is also why good SOC 2 audit consultancy helps. A strong consulting partner guides you through what needs to be tracked every month so you do not accumulate surprises later.

2. Control ownership is unclear

Policies get documented, but no one is explicitly responsible for executing them. During the audit, this becomes visible immediately. The auditor wants to see who performs each control, who signs off, and how consistently it was done.

How to avoid it

  • Assign one owner per control.

  • Keep the list simple. Ownership removes guesswork and reduces audit friction.

3. Evidence is collected too late

SOC 2 Type II is unforgiving when it comes to missing logs. The most common reason companies fail is the lack of evidence for certain months in the audit window.

How to avoid it

  • Collect evidence continuously.

  • Set reminders.

  • Use automation for log collection whenever possible.

If you are unsure which parts need monthly evidence and which only need periodic checks, refer to a structured comparison of SOC 2 Type I vs Type II. Understanding the difference early prevents compliance gaps later in the year.

4. Access management breaks without anyone noticing

Access controls drift silently. Former employees still have accounts. MFA is not enabled everywhere. Shared credentials slip through. All of this becomes visible during Type II.

How to avoid it

  • Run monthly access reviews.

  • Make offboarding a strict checklist.

  • Monitor MFA coverage across every critical system.

5. Change management is not documented

Engineers push changes, but the documentation of approvals, peer reviews, and deployment trails is missing. Type II requires not just the change but the full trace around it.

How to avoid it

  • Embed approvals into your GitHub or GitLab workflow.

  • Make the process part of the development culture instead of an extra compliance task.

6. Monitoring tools exist, but review cycles do not

Companies often have good monitoring and alerting systems, but no one regularly reviews the alerts or documents their responses.

How to avoid it

  • Review alerts every week.

  • Maintain an incident response log even for minor issues.

  • Show the auditor you detect and act, not just deploy tools.

7. Starting Type II before the team is ready

Pressure from customers often pushes teams into Type II prematurely. Without operational maturity, gaps show up quickly during the audit.

How to avoid it

  • Do a readiness assessment.

  • Conduct a practice audit and fix operational gaps before committing to the full Type II period.

A seasoned SOC 2 consultancy makes this step far smoother because they identify weak areas early and guide teams on how to fix them.

Conclusion

SOC 2 Type II is not difficult when your security operations run smoothly. It only becomes stressful when teams treat it as a documentation exercise rather than an operational discipline.

If you want guidance, structure, or hands on support in preparing for SOC 2 Type I or Type II, you can explore our SOC 2 Audit and Attestation service. It outlines how the audit works, what you need to prepare, and how our team can help you avoid the mistakes that derail most companies during Type II.

Top comments (0)