I recently needed to add a LinkedIn feed on a website I was working on. Sounds simple, right?
Turns out… not really.
LinkedIn doesn’t offer a proper native widget like some other platforms. There’s no clean “drop this feed on your site” option. That meant I had to explore third-party tools, test a few approaches, and figure out what actually works without breaking the design or slowing down the page.
If you’re trying to do the same, here’s a breakdown of what I learned.
Why Add a LinkedIn Feed to a Website?
Before getting into tools, it’s worth understanding why this matters.
For most business or portfolio websites, LinkedIn is where:
- Updates happen regularly
- Company activity is visible
- Social proof builds naturally Instead of manually copying posts to your website, embedding a feed keeps everything in sync automatically.
It also helps with:
- Keeping your site fresh without extra work
- Showing real-time activity
- Building credibility, especially for B2B websites
The Problem with Native LinkedIn Embeds
LinkedIn does allow embedding individual posts, but that’s about it.
Limitations I ran into:
- No full feed display
- No customization
- No layout control
- Not scalable for multiple posts
So if you want something dynamic, you’ll need a third-party solution.
What I Looked for in a Tool
- Before picking anything, I had a few requirements:
- Should update automatically when new posts are published
- Easy to embed (preferably just a script or iframe)
- Doesn’t slow down the website
- Allows some level of design control
- Works well on mobile
These filters helped narrow things down pretty quickly.
Tools I Tried for adding LinkedIn Feeds
Here are a few tools I tested and how they felt in real use.
1. Taggbox (Most Complete Setup)
This was one of the first tools I tried, and honestly, it covered almost everything I needed.
What stood out:
- The feed updated in real time without manual refresh
- The layout options were flexible (grid, slider, etc.)
- There’s a moderation panel to control what shows up
- Embedding was just copy-paste
It didn’t feel overly technical, but still gave enough control to match the website design.
If you’re building something client-facing or brand-heavy, this kind of setup makes things easier.
2. Tagembed (Quick and Lightweight Option)
Tagembed was probably the fastest to embed linkedin feed.
What I liked:
- Very clean interface
- Quick onboarding
- Simple embed process
- Lightweight widget
It’s a solid option if you don’t want to spend too much time configuring things and just need something that works.
3. Juicer.io (Good for Multi-Platform Feeds)
Juicer felt more like a “combine everything” tool.
It supports multiple platforms, so if you want LinkedIn + Instagram + Twitter in one feed, it’s useful.
For just LinkedIn though, it felt a bit broader than necessary.
4. SociableKIT (Basic but Functional)
This one is straightforward.
It works, but customization is limited compared to others. Good if you just need a simple LinkedIn feed without much styling.
5. Walls.io (More for Campaigns)
Walls.io feels more suited for event-based displays or social walls.
If you’re running campaigns or live displays, it makes sense. For a regular website feed, it might be more than needed.
How I Actually added the LinkedIn Feed
Most tools follow a similar process. Here’s what it looked like:
- Connect LinkedIn account
- Choose feed type (company page or profile)
- Customize layout
- Copy embed code
- Paste into website
Example (simplified):
That’s pretty much it.
If you’re using WordPress, you can drop it into:
- Custom HTML block
- Elementor widget
- Theme files
Performance Considerations
One thing I paid attention to was page speed.
Some widgets can:
- Add extra scripts
- Delay loading
- Affect Core Web Vitals
From what I tested:
- Lightweight tools performed better
- Lazy loading helps
- Avoid overloading with too many posts
Benefits I Noticed After Adding It
Once the feed was live, a few things improved:
- The website felt more active
- Visitors could see recent updates without leaving the site
- It added a layer of credibility
- Reduced the need for manual content updates
It’s one of those small additions that quietly improves the overall experience.
Things to Keep in Mind
A few limitations still exist:
- LinkedIn API restrictions mean you depend on third-party tools
- Free plans often include branding
- Some tools limit customization unless you upgrade
So it’s worth choosing based on your actual use case, not just features.
Final Thoughts
Adding a LinkedIn feed isn’t complicated—but finding the right approach takes a bit of trial and error.
If you want something feature-rich and flexible, tools like Taggbox worked well in my experience.
If you prefer something simpler and quicker to deploy, Tagembed is a solid option.
Either way, once it’s set up, it becomes a low-maintenance way to keep your website dynamic and connected to your LinkedIn presence.
Top comments (2)
Very Insightful
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.