đź‘‹ Hello Dev Community ,
I hope this post finds you well.
Over the past few months, I’ve conducted extensive security research into the generation and validation of BIP-39 mnemonic recovery phrases used across multiple blockchain ecosystems — including Ethereum, Solana, Bytecoin, and others.
During this analysis, I discovered a potential non-uniform entropy distribution in the generated seed phrases — a subtle but concerning irregularity that may compromise wallet security in specific scenarios.
🔍 Key Observations
High Word Frequency Bias
Certain words appear disproportionately as the first, middle, or last words in mnemonic sequences.
Example: Some words occurred over 300 times as the initial word in generated valid 12- or 24-word phrases.
Abnormal Validation Rates
From a test batch of 150,000 programmatically generated phrases, we observed:
âś… 9,600+ valid wallets for 12-word English phrases
âś… 14,000+ valid wallets for 24-word English phrases
âś… 8,000+ valid wallets for 24-word Czech phrases
Statistical Anomalies
These rates suggest that valid mnemonic discovery is not entirely random, potentially due to:
Biased word distribution
Flawed entropy sources
Weak random number generation (RNG)
🛡️ Potential Impact
If BIP-39 implementations across platforms are found to have biases or entropy flaws, it could reduce the effective search space — making brute-force or partial-recovery attacks more feasible.
This weakness might affect wallet providers or applications using BIP-39 without adequate entropy enhancements or post-generation entropy checks.
Top comments (0)