DEV Community

lucia1700
lucia1700

Posted on

Why I stopped using "Vibe Coding" and built a Socratic AI instead.

The "Vibe Coding" Trap
Like many of you, when AI first came out, I felt like a wizard. I could conjure entire functions with a single sentence. It felt like magic.

But after a few months, I realized something unsettling: I was becoming dumber.

I wasn't "Architecting" anymore; I was just "Prompting". If the AI gave me code that worked, I didn't verify it. If it gave me a security vulnerability (like a raw SQL query), I pasted it anyway because "it ran".

I call this "Vibe Coding"—coding based on feelings and output speed, rather than rigorous engineering.

Reclaiming the "Thinking Process"
I didn't want to stop using AI—it's too powerful. But I wanted an AI that treated me like a Senior Engineer, not a copy-paster.

I wanted an AI that would:

Stop me before generating code.
Ask me tough questions about my architecture.
Respect me enough to let me make the final decision.
So, I built BlueMouse.

What is BlueMouse? 🐭
BlueMouse is a local, open-source CLI tool (Python) that acts as a "Socratic Gatekeeper" between you and the LLM.

Instead of:

User: "Make me a login page." AI: "Here is 500 lines of React code."

BlueMouse does this:

User: "Make me a login page." BlueMouse: "Wait. Before we code, let's architect this.

How are you handling session tokens? (JWT vs Session)
Do you need CSRF protection for the forms?
What is the password hashing strategy?"
It forces you to THINK. It forces you to be the Architect.

Under the Hood (Python + MCP)
The tool is built with a few core principles:

100% Local: No hidden cloud servers. Your data stays with you.
17-Layer Validation: It runs a rigorous check on generated code to ensure it meets industrial standards (no placeholder comments, no TODOs, no broken imports).
Socratic Logic Gate: A dedicated prompt chain that prioritizes questions over answers.
I even added a little Easter egg in the verification script

Because rigorous engineering can still be cute.

Open Source & "Respectful Software"
I believe the future of AI shouldn't be about replacing programmers, but augmenting our intelligence. Tools should help us think deeper, not just type faster.

If you are interested in trying a "Socratic" workflow, or just want to see how the validation logic works, check out the repo.

GitHub: https://github.com/peijun1700/bluemouse Website: https://bluemouse.app

Let me know in the comments: Do you feel AI is helping you learn, or is it making you skip the hard parts?

Top comments (0)