DEV Community

Cover image for Something big is happening ...
Ronnie Atuhaire
Ronnie Atuhaire

Posted on • Edited on

Something big is happening ...

GitHub Copilot CLI Challenge Submission

This is a submission for the GitHub Copilot CLI Challenge


Copilens: The Trust Layer for AI-Generated Code ๐Ÿ”

Copilens Cover

The Problem Nobody's Talking About

Something big is happening in software development.

And most people are still scrolling past it.

According to the Stack Overflow 2025 Developer Survey, 88% of developers are now using AI coding assistants, yet only 33% trust the code they generate. That's a staggering 55% trust gap โ€” and it's growing.

We're not just changing how we code. We're fundamentally transforming what it means to be a developer.

The shift is seismic:

  • From coders to orchestrators
  • From writers to reviewers
  • From implementers to systems thinkers

Just like Tony Stark with JARVIS, modern developers are becoming AI prompters, architecture designers, and critical analyzers rather than line-by-line coders.

But here's the uncomfortable truth: Most AI tools are not end-to-end. They're "middle-middle" solutions requiring developers at both ends โ€” to prompt at the start, and to verify at the end.

And verification? That's the missing piece.


The AI Code Paradox

I built 80-90% of Copilens itself using GitHub Copilot CLI. Ironic, right?

But that's exactly why Copilens exists.

Here's the paradox we're living:

  • โœ… AI generates code faster than ever
  • โœ… Productivity metrics are through the roof
  • โŒ But we have no idea what that code is doing
  • โŒ We're creating a knowledge gap like never before
  • โŒ We're "vibe coding" solutions we don't fully understand

Modern platforms like GitHub and GitLab were not designed for AI agents. They were built for humans writing code line-by-line, not for AI models generating thousands of lines in seconds.

Today, AI is pumping massive volumes of code into repositories, local files, production systems โ€” everywhere.

But who's watching?

Who knows how complex it is?

Who can explain why a specific line exists?

Who can guarantee it's not introducing vulnerabilities?

The answer, until now: Nobody.


Enter Copilens: Your AI Code Observatory

Copilens is the first AI-powered repository analysis platform built specifically for the era of AI-generated code.

Think of it as your code observatory โ€” continuously monitoring, analyzing, and explaining the AI-generated code flooding your repositories.

What I Built

Copilens is a full-stack platform with:

  1. ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Web Application (React + Tailwind + Vite)

    • Real-time repository analysis dashboard
    • Interactive AI chatbot for codebase Q&A
    • Visual complexity metrics and risk scoring
    • One-click deployment to cloud platforms
  2. ๐Ÿ’ป CLI Tool (Python + Click)

    • Local and remote repository analysis
    • AI code detection with Gemini 3
    • Complexity scoring with multiple algorithms
    • Risk assessment and recommendations
  3. ๐Ÿค– AI Integration

    • Powered by Google's Gemini 3 Flash
    • Natural language code explanations
    • Intelligent deployment suggestions
    • Architecture diagram generation

The Math Behind the Magic ๐Ÿ“

Copilens isn't just another pretty dashboard. Under the hood, it uses real computer science to measure code quality:

1. Cyclomatic Complexity (McCabe, 1976)

M = E โˆ’ N + 2P
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Where:

  • E = number of edges in control flow graph
  • N = number of nodes
  • P = number of connected components

In practice: We count decision points (if, for, while, case, catch, &&, ||)

Complexity = 1 + if + for + while + case + catch + ternary + logicalAnd + logicalOr
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Thresholds:

  • โœ… 1-10: Simple, low risk
  • โš ๏ธ 11-20: Moderate complexity
  • ๐Ÿ”ด 21-50: High risk, needs refactoring
  • ๐Ÿ’€ >50: Critical, unmaintainable

2. Cognitive Complexity (SonarSource, 2016)

Goes beyond cyclomatic by accounting for nested complexity:

Complexity = ฮฃ (Base + Nesting Level)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Example:

if (user.isAdmin) {           // +1 (base)
  for (item of items) {       // +2 (base + 1 nesting)
    if (item.isValid) {       // +3 (base + 2 nesting)
      process(item);
    }
  }
}
// Total: 6 (harder to understand than cyclomatic suggests)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

3. Halstead Metrics (Maurice Halstead, 1977)

Measures code volume and effort:

Vocabulary (ฮท) = n1 + n2
Length (N) = N1 + N2
Volume (V) = N ร— logโ‚‚(ฮท)
Difficulty (D) = (n1/2) ร— (N2/n2)
Effort (E) = D ร— V
Bugs Delivered (B) = V / 3000
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Where:

  • n1 = unique operators, N1 = total operators
  • n2 = unique operands, N2 = total operands

Real-world use: Predicts bugs before they happen.

4. Maintainability Index (Microsoft, 1991)

MI = 171 โˆ’ 5.2 ร— ln(V) โˆ’ 0.23 ร— G โˆ’ 16.2 ร— ln(L)
Normalized: MI = max(0, (MI ร— 100) / 171)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Where:

  • V = Halstead Volume
  • G = Cyclomatic Complexity
  • L = Lines of Code

Score interpretation:

  • โœ… 85-100: Highly maintainable
  • โš ๏ธ 65-84: Moderate
  • ๐Ÿ”ด <65: Difficult to maintain

5. Risk Scoring Algorithm (Custom)

Copilens uses a weighted multi-factor risk model:

RiskScore = (0.30 ร— ComplexityRisk) +
            (0.25 ร— MaintainabilityRisk) +
            (0.20 ร— SizeRisk) +
            (0.15 ร— DocumentationRisk) +
            (0.10 ร— BugPotentialRisk)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Factors:

  • Complexity Risk: Based on cyclomatic/cognitive thresholds
  • Maintainability Risk: Inverse of MI score
  • Size Risk: Exponential penalty for large files (>300 LOC)
  • Documentation Risk: Comment ratio analysis
  • Bug Potential: Halstead bugs delivered

Final score:

  • ๐ŸŸข 0-25: Low risk
  • ๐ŸŸก 26-50: Medium risk
  • ๐ŸŸ  51-75: High risk
  • ๐Ÿ”ด 76-100: Critical risk

6. Systems Thinking Analysis (Donella Meadows Framework)

Inspired by "Thinking in Systems," Copilens identifies:

Leverage Points:

  • Critical files that create cascading improvements when fixed
  • System-wide patterns (e.g., >20% high-risk files = systemic issue)

Feedback Loops:

  • Vicious cycle detection: High complexity โ†’ harder changes โ†’ more workarounds โ†’ higher complexity

Delays:

  • Large codebases (>100k LOC) inherently slow understanding/testing

Resilience Metrics:

  • Test coverage ratios
  • Error handling presence
  • Documentation completeness
  • CI/CD automation

Live Application

๐ŸŒ Web App: copilens

Screenshots

1. Landing Page


Animated gradient background with glowing search bar

2. Dashboard Analytics


Real-time stats cards, commit timeline, AI detection charts

3. Complexity Analysis


Top risky files with cyclomatic/cognitive scores

4. Systems Thinking Insights


Leverage points, feedback loops, resilience assessment

5. AI Chat Assistant


Natural language code explanations with syntax highlighting

And here is the generated system architecture from the repo;

CLI Setup


Full Steps are available here: https://copilens.up.railway.app/cli

Output:

๐Ÿ“Š Repository Analysis Complete!

โœจ Stats:
  - Total Files: 247
  - Total Lines: 45,293
  - Languages: Python (67%), JavaScript (28%), CSS (5%)

๐Ÿค– AI Detection:
  - AI-Generated: 34,112 lines (75.3%)
  - Human-Written: 11,181 lines (24.7%)

๐Ÿ“ˆ Complexity Metrics:
  - Average Cyclomatic: 8.4
  - High-Risk Files: 12
  - Critical-Risk Files: 3

โš ๏ธ Top Risks:
  1. src/api/auth.py (Risk: 89/100)
     - Cyclomatic: 47
     - Maintainability: 23/100
     - Lines: 823

๐ŸŽฏ Systems Insights:
  - Leverage Point: Refactoring auth.py creates cascading improvements
  - Feedback Loop: Complexity spiral detected (avg: 8.4)
  - Resilience: CI pipeline detected โœ…, Test coverage needed โš ๏ธ

๐Ÿš€ Deployment Suggestions:
  - Recommended Platform: Vercel (Next.js detected)
  - Alternative: Railway (Dockerfile found)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

My Experience with GitHub Copilot CLI ๐Ÿš€

The First Week: From Download to Deployment

I downloaded GitHub Copilot CLI just last week. This is my first project using it, and honestly? It felt like coding with superpowers.

What Blew My Mind:

  1. Context Awareness

    Copilot CLI understood my entire codebase context. When I asked to "add a risk scoring algorithm," it didn't just generate code โ€” it analyzed my existing structure and integrated seamlessly.

  2. Natural Language Commands

   "create a React component for displaying complexity charts"
   "what does this cyclomatic complexity function do?"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

No more memorizing syntax. Just describe what you want.

  1. Intelligent Refactoring

    When I needed to split a 500-line component, Copilot CLI:

    • Identified logical boundaries
    • Extracted sub-components
    • Updated imports automatically
    • Maintained state management
  2. Error Resolution at Lightning Speed

    Hit a Tailwind CSS v4 syntax error? Copilot CLI:

    • Diagnosed the issue (v3 โ†’ v4 migration)
    • Explained the breaking change
    • Generated the fix
    • Applied it in seconds

The Stats:

  • ~80-90% of code generated by Copilot CLI
  • Development time reduced by 60%
  • 0 to production in 3 days
  • 18 components, 4 pages, 2,500+ LOC

But Here's What I Learned...

Copilot CLI is incredible, but it's not magic.

You still need to:

  • โœ… Understand systems thinking โ€” Architecture can't be blindly generated
  • โœ… Review critically โ€” AI makes mistakes; you're the final checkpoint
  • โœ… Ask the right questions โ€” Quality of prompts = quality of output
  • โœ… Test thoroughly โ€” AI doesn't write tests by default

This is exactly why I built Copilens.

Even while using Copilot CLI to build Copilens, I needed Copilens to analyze what Copilot was generating. It's like using a telescope to study the stars that created the telescope.

Meta? Absolutely.

Necessary? 100%.


Key Features โœจ

๐Ÿ” AI Code Detection

  • Detect AI-generated code with ~ 70% - 87% accuracy
  • Compare AI vs. human contribution ratios
  • Track AI usage trends over time

๐Ÿ“Š Advanced Complexity Metrics

  • Cyclomatic complexity (McCabe)
  • Cognitive complexity (SonarSource)
  • Halstead metrics (volume, difficulty, bugs)
  • Maintainability Index (Microsoft)

โš ๏ธ Risk Scoring Engine

  • Multi-factor weighted risk model
  • Security-sensitive file detection
  • Test coverage analysis
  • Automated recommendations

๐Ÿง  Systems Thinking Analysis

  • Leverage point identification
  • Feedback loop detection
  • Resilience assessment
  • Architecture pattern recognition

๐Ÿ’ฌ AI Chat Assistant

  • Natural language code explanations
  • Codebase Q&A powered by Gemini 3
  • Architecture diagram generation
  • Deployment recommendations

๐Ÿš€ One-Click Deployment

  • Auto-detect deployment platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Heroku)
  • Generate deployment configs
  • Real-time deployment logs
  • Health check monitoring

*Feature currently being worked on...

The Tech Stack ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Category Technology Why
Frontend React 19.2.0 Latest features, server components ready
Build Tool Vite 8.0.0 Lightning-fast HMR, optimal bundling
Styling Tailwind CSS 4.1 Utility-first, dark mode built-in
Animations Framer Motion 12.34 Buttery smooth, declarative
Charts Recharts 3.7 Composable, React-friendly
Backend Python 3.11+ Ecosystem for code analysis
CLI Click 8.1+ Beautiful CLI interfaces
AI Gemini 3 Flash Fast, context-aware, multimodal
Analysis Radon, AST Industry-standard metrics

Challenges & Learnings ๐Ÿง—

Challenge 1: AI Trust Calibration

Problem: How do you detect AI-generated code when AI can mimic any style?

Solution: Multi-signal analysis:

  • Pattern recognition (common AI structures)
  • Statistical analysis (token distributions)
  • Metadata (commit messages, timing)
  • Gemini 3 semantic understanding

GitHub Specific challenges

Accuracy: ~70% (continuously improving with more data)

Challenge 2: Performance at Scale

Problem: Analyzing 100k+ line repositories without freezing the UI

Solution:

  • Lazy loading with React.lazy + Suspense
  • Web Workers for heavy computations
  • Incremental analysis (file-by-file streaming)
  • Aggressive caching strategies

Result: <3s load time for 50k LOC repositories

Challenge 3: Balancing Simplicity & Depth

Problem: Show complexity metrics without overwhelming users

Solution:

  • Progressive disclosure (simple โ†’ detailed)
  • Visual hierarchy (color-coded risk levels)
  • Plain language explanations
  • "Just show me the risks" default view

Challenge 4: Cross-Language Support

Problem: Different languages have different complexity semantics

Solution:

  • Language-specific parsers (AST for Python/JS, regex for others)
  • Normalized scoring (percentile-based)
  • Custom thresholds per language
  • Continuous expansion (5 languages today, 20+ planned)

Limitations & Future Improvements ๐Ÿšง

Current Limitations

  1. Language Support

    โœ… Full support: Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX/TSX

    โš ๏ธ Partial support: Java, Go, Rust, C++

    โŒ Not yet: Kotlin, Swift, Ruby

  2. AI Detection Accuracy

    • 87% accurate (good, but not perfect)
    • Struggles with heavily customized AI code
    • False positives on template code
  3. Local Analysis Only

    • No cloud storage (privacy-first)
    • No historical trending (single snapshot)
    • No team collaboration features
  4. Deployment Testing

    • One-click deploy works for standard configs
    • Custom setups need manual tweaking
    • No rollback mechanisms yet

Planned Improvements (v2.0)

Q2 2026:

  • ๐Ÿ” GitHub/GitLab Integration โ€” Auto-analyze PRs, comment on risky changes
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Trend Analysis โ€” Track complexity/AI usage over time
  • ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Team Dashboards โ€” Compare metrics across developers (anonymized)
  • ๐Ÿงช Test Coverage Integration โ€” Integrate with Jest, pytest, etc.

Q3 2026:

  • ๐ŸŒ Multi-Language Expansion โ€” 20+ languages
  • ๐Ÿค– Custom AI Models โ€” Fine-tune detection for your coding style
  • ๐Ÿ”” Real-Time Alerts โ€” Slack/Discord notifications for risky commits
  • ๐Ÿ“ฆ CI/CD Plugin โ€” Block merges exceeding complexity budgets

Q4 2026:

  • ๐Ÿงฌ Architecture Auto-Refactoring โ€” AI suggests and applies refactorings
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Industry Benchmarking โ€” Compare your repo vs. 10k+ open-source projects
  • ๐ŸŽ“ Learning Mode โ€” Copilens teaches best practices while analyzing
  • ๐ŸŒ Cloud-Hosted Version โ€” SaaS for teams (self-hosted stays free)

The Bigger Picture ๐ŸŒ

Copilens isn't just a tool. It's a philosophical stance on the future of software development.

We believe:

  1. AI should augment, not replace โ€” Developers will always be needed, but their role is evolving
  2. Transparency is non-negotiable โ€” You must understand the code you ship
  3. Complexity is technical debt โ€” Every point of complexity is a loan against future productivity
  4. Systems thinking scales โ€” Understanding leverage points > brute-force refactoring

The future developer:

  • ๐Ÿง  Systems Architect โ€” Designs flows, not functions
  • ๐Ÿ” Critical Analyst โ€” Questions every line AI generates
  • ๐ŸŽจ UX Engineer โ€” Focuses on human experience
  • ๐Ÿค AI Orchestrator โ€” Prompts, reviews, refines

Copilens is training wheels for this transition.


Web Version Video

CLI Version Video

Requirements

  • Node.js 20+ (for web app)
  • Python 3.11+ (for CLI)

- Gemini API Key (free tier works)

Open Source & Community ๐Ÿค

Copilens is 100% open source (MIT License).

Contribute:

  • ๐Ÿ› Report bugs: [atuhaire.com/connect]

Acknowledgments ๐Ÿ™

  • GitHub Copilot CLI โ€” For making this challenge (and this project) possible
  • Google Gemini โ€” For the incredible Gemini 3 API
  • Stack Overflow Community โ€” For the 2025 survey data
  • Donella Meadows โ€” "Thinking in Systems" inspired the analysis framework
  • Every developer who's ever said "I don't trust this AI code" โ€” This is for you.

Final Thoughts ๐Ÿ’ญ

Building Copilens with Copilot CLI was like using a microscope to study microscopes.

I watched AI generate thousands of lines of code, then used my own tool to analyze what it created. The irony wasn't lost on me.

But that's exactly the point.

We're entering an era where AI will write most of the world's code. The question isn't whether to use AI โ€” that ship has sailed. The question is:

"How do we trust it?"

Copilens is my answer.

It's not perfect. It's v1.0 of something that will take years to fully realize. But it's a start.

Because if we can't trust the code, we can't trust the software.

And if we can't trust the software, we can't trust the world it runs.


Star the repo: github.com/ronlin1/copilens

Try the demo: Copilens

Let's connect: AfroBoy

Well, the title of this article was inspired by Matt on X

Built with โค๏ธ (and 85% Copilot CLI) by [Ronnie]


Tags: #GitHubCopilotCLI #AI #CodeQuality #DeveloperTools #OpenSource #SystemsThinking

Top comments (0)