Sandi Metz, author of Practical Object-Oriented Design in Ruby and 99 Bottles of OOP, believes in simple code and straightforward explanations. She writes, consults, and teaches about OO design.
Collaborating with Katrina was equal parts delightful and a cause of great head-banging, as you'd likely expect. Let me be clear--Katrina is wonderful, it's just that the very process of collaboration requires compromise, and blending disparate ideas. This was good for the resulting book, but not necessarily welcomed in the moment.
Sandi Metz, author of Practical Object-Oriented Design in Ruby and 99 Bottles of OOP, believes in simple code and straightforward explanations. She writes, consults, and teaches about OO design.
Too many, really, to pick one. Katrina and I as very different. The core lesson for me was that while it's easy to pair with someone who is like you, it's better, if you can stand it, to pair with someone who is different.
Being forced to resolve our differences improved our understanding of the material, and vastly improved that book. This only worked because, despite our head-banging, we respected one another's ideas, and believed that if we stayed at a discussion (read, argument) long enough, we would find that we actually agreed.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Collaborating with Katrina was equal parts delightful and a cause of great head-banging, as you'd likely expect. Let me be clear--Katrina is wonderful, it's just that the very process of collaboration requires compromise, and blending disparate ideas. This was good for the resulting book, but not necessarily welcomed in the moment.
Any memorable conflicts that you're both laughing about now?!
Too many, really, to pick one. Katrina and I as very different. The core lesson for me was that while it's easy to pair with someone who is like you, it's better, if you can stand it, to pair with someone who is different.
Being forced to resolve our differences improved our understanding of the material, and vastly improved that book. This only worked because, despite our head-banging, we respected one another's ideas, and believed that if we stayed at a discussion (read, argument) long enough, we would find that we actually agreed.