Remember when we thought Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) were the pinnacle of language understanding? Those were simpler times. RNNs processed text word by word, like reading a book with one eye closed technically possible, but frustratingly limited. They'd forget the beginning of a sentence by the time they reached the end, struggled with long-term dependencies, and were painfully slow to train because everything had to happen sequentially.
Then came LSTMs and GRUs, which were like giving our networks a better memory. But they still had that fundamental limitation: they couldn't look at all the words at once. It was like trying to understand a painting by examining one brushstroke at a time.
Everything changed in 2017 when researchers at Google published a paper with the now famous title "Attention Is All You Need." The Transformer architecture they introduced didn't just improve on RNNs it completely reimagined how machines process language. Instead of plodding through text one word at a time, Transformers could look at entire sequences simultaneously, understanding context from all directions at once.
But here's where it gets interesting: not all Transformers are created equal. Depending on what you're trying to accomplish, you might need a different type of Transformer architecture. Let's break down the three main types and when you'd want to use each one.
Encoder-Only Models: The Knowledgeable Readers
Think of encoder-only models as the scholars of the AI world they're all about deeply understanding and analyzing text that already exists.
How They Work
These models use only the encoder portion of the Transformer architecture. They read text bidirectionally, meaning they can look at words both before and after any given position. It's like how you understand a sentence you don't just process words left to right; you understand them in the context of the entire sentence.
The key innovation here is something called "masked language modeling." During training, these models learn by having random words hidden from them, and they have to predict what's missing based on surrounding context. It's like learning to read by doing fill-in-the-blank exercises with the entire sentence visible.
What They're Good At
Encoder-only models excel at understanding and analyzing text:
Search Engines: When you type a query into Google, encoder models help understand what you're really asking for, even if your phrasing is awkward or ambiguous.
Named Entity Recognition (NER): These models can identify and classify important elements in text people, places, organizations, dates. They're the reason your email app can automatically detect when someone mentions a meeting time.
Sentiment Analysis: Want to know if a product review is positive or negative? Or analyze thousands of customer feedback messages? Encoder models can understand the emotional tone and nuances of language.
Text Classification: Spam detection, topic categorization, intent classification anything where you need to put text into buckets.
Question Answering: Models like BERT revolutionized this space. Give them a passage and a question, and they can point to exactly where the answer lives in the text.
Popular Examples
BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) is the poster child here, but you've also got RoBERTa, ALBERT, and DistilBERT. These models power a huge chunk of the text understanding that happens behind the scenes in your favorite apps.
Decoder-Only Models: The Creative Writers
If encoders are scholars, decoders are novelists. They're the creative types, the generators, the ones who can conjure text from thin air.
How They Work
Decoder-only models use a technique called "causal language modeling" or "autoregressive generation." They can only look at previous tokens (words to the left), not future ones. This might sound like a limitation, but it's actually their superpower it makes them incredible at generating coherent, contextual text one word at a time.
Think of it like writing a story: you know what you've written so far, and you use that to decide what comes next. You can't see the future, but you can create it, word by word.
What They're Good At
These models shine when you need to create something new:
Chatbots: GPT, Claude, Gemini all the conversational AI you interact with uses decoder architectures. They understand your message and generate responses that feel natural and contextually appropriate.
Content Generation: Need blog posts, product descriptions, email drafts, or creative stories? Decoder models can generate human like text on virtually any topic.
Code Autocomplete: Tools like GitHub Copilot use decoder models to predict what code you want to write next. They've learned patterns from millions of code repositories and can suggest entire functions based on your comments or partial code.
Creative Writing: Poetry, fiction, screenplays decoder models can generate creative content in various styles and voices.
Programming Assistants: Beyond autocomplete, these models can explain code, debug issues, and even help you learn new programming languages.
Popular Examples
The GPT family (GPT-3, GPT-4) dominated headlines, but you're also seeing incredible work from Claude (that's me!), Gemini, and Meta's Llama models. Each has its own personality and strengths, but they're all built on that decoder foundation.
Encoder-Decoder Models: The Translators and Editors
Encoder-decoder models are the bridge builders, the ones who excel at transforming input into output when both understanding and generation matter.
How They Work
These models use the full Transformer architecture both the encoder and decoder components working in tandem. The encoder reads and understands the input (looking at it bidirectionally), creating rich representations of meaning. Then the decoder takes those representations and generates output word by word (looking only at previous tokens).
It's like having a translator who first fully understands what you said in English, then carefully crafts the equivalent message in French. The understanding and generation phases are distinct but connected.
What They're Good At
These models are specialists in transformation tasks:
Translation: This is where encoder-decoder models truly shine. They can understand the source language deeply (encoder) and generate fluent output in the target language (decoder). T5 and mBART have set remarkable benchmarks here.
Summarization: Whether you need to condense a 10-page report into a paragraph or create executive summaries of research papers, encoder-decoder models can understand the full context and generate concise, accurate summaries.
Paraphrasing: Need to rewrite content in a different style or reading level? These models understand your input and can generate alternative versions that preserve meaning while changing form.
Answer Generation: Unlike encoder-only models that extract answers from text, encoder-decoder models can synthesize information and generate comprehensive answers in their own words.
Dialogue Generation: For more complex conversational systems where you need to understand context deeply and generate varied responses.
Popular Examples
T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) treats every NLP task as a text-to-text problem, which is elegantly simple. BART and mBART are also powerful players in this space, particularly for multilingual tasks.
Choosing the Right Tool for the Job
So which architecture should you use? Here's my practical take:
Choose encoder-only when you need to understand, analyze, or classify existing text. If you're asking "what is this?" or "what does this mean?"—think encoders.
Choose decoder-only when you need to generate new content from scratch or continue existing text. If you're asking "what comes next?" or "create something new" think decoders.
Choose encoder-decoder when you need to transform input into different output while preserving meaning. If you're asking "say this differently" or "convert this to that" think encoder-decoder.
The Bigger Picture
What's fascinating is that the line between these categories is blurring. Modern decoder-only models like GPT-4 and Claude can perform many tasks that traditionally required encoder-only or encoder-decoder architectures. They've gotten so good at understanding context that they can handle classification, analysis, and transformation tasks alongside generation.
This is partly because of scale bigger models with more parameters can learn more nuanced patterns but it's also about training techniques. Methods like instruction tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback have taught decoder models to be more versatile.
Still, specialized architectures have their place. Encoder-only models are typically more efficient for pure understanding tasks, and encoder-decoder models often perform better for translation and summarization when you have the data to train them properly.
Looking Forward
The evolution from RNNs to Transformers felt revolutionary, but we're still in the early chapters of this story. Researchers are exploring hybrid architectures, more efficient attention mechanisms, and ways to make these models better at reasoning and long-term planning.
What started as a quest to help computers understand language has become something more profound we're teaching machines to think, to create, to translate not just between languages but between ideas. And whether you're building a search engine, a chatbot, or a translation service, understanding these three Transformer types helps you choose the right tool for bringing those ideas to life.
The next time you use a search engine, chat with an AI assistant, or translate a document, you'll know there's a specialized Transformer architecture working behind the scenes—each one perfectly suited to its task, each one a descendant of that simple but powerful idea: attention is all you need.
Thanks
Sreeni Ramadorai
Top comments (0)