DEV Community

Tiago Rosa da costa
Tiago Rosa da costa

Posted on

Holding the Load: Handling Webhook Traffic Spikes Without Scaling Your cheap VPS

Webhook-based architectures are everywhere.

From payment providers to automation platforms and SaaS integrations, webhooks are often the primary way systems communicate asynchronously. They work well until traffic spikes hit a self-hosted environment.

This post explains Holding the Load, a project I built to solve a very specific but common problem:
how to absorb webhook spikes without vertically scaling a VPS.

The Problem: Webhooks Are Bursty by Nature

If you self-host applications or automation tools, you’ve probably seen this pattern:

  • A VPS handles normal traffic just fine
  • Webhooks arrive in short bursts
  • A spike happens (campaigns, batch events, retries, provider issues)
  • CPU and memory usage explode
  • Requests fail or time out

Most webhook providers don’t care about your infrastructure limits. They will:

  • Retry aggressively
  • Send large volumes in a short time window
  • Assume you can handle it

The usual response is to scale the VPS:

  • More CPU
  • More memory
  • Higher monthly cost

But here’s the issue:
That extra capacity is often needed only for minutes or hours, not 24/7.

The Core Idea Behind Holding the Load

Holding the Load introduces a decoupling layer between webhook ingestion and processing.

Instead of letting webhooks hit your VPS directly, you place Holding the Load in front of it.

At a high level:

Webhook Provider
       |
       v
Holding the Load (buffer + control)
       |
       v
Your VPS (consumer)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This separation is the key to stability.

What Is Holding the Load?

Holding the Load is a lightweight application designed to:

  • Receive high volumes of webhook requests
  • Store them temporarily
  • Expose a controlled consumption mechanism for downstream services

Your VPS no longer reacts to traffic spikes.
Instead, it pulls messages at a rate it can safely handle.

How It Works (Technically)

1. Webhook Ingestion

  • Webhook requests are received by Holding the Load
  • Requests are acknowledged immediately
  • Payloads are persisted (FIFO ordering)

This protects webhook providers from timeouts while isolating your backend.

2. Storage as a Buffer

Holding the Load acts as a queue-like buffer:

  • Incoming webhooks are stored in Durable object(service from Cloudflare) using sqlite storage, so preventing lose the webhook data.
  • Order is preserved
  • No processing happens at ingestion time

This is critical: ingestion and processing are completely decoupled.

3. Controlled Consumption by Your VPS

Your application:

  • Pulls messages from Holding the Load
  • Defines:
    • Batch size
    • Pull interval

Example:

  • Fetch 10 messages every 5 seconds
  • Or 50 messages every minute
  • Or any strategy that fits your VPS capacity

The first webhook received is always the first consumed (FIFO).

Why This Architecture Matters

This approach solves multiple problems at once:

✅ Traffic Spike Absorption

Webhook spikes are handled upstream without affecting your VPS.

✅ Predictable Resource Usage

Your VPS workload becomes stable and predictable.

✅ No Overprovisioning

You don’t need to pay for peak capacity all month long.

✅ Failure Isolation

Even if your VPS goes down temporarily, webhooks are not lost.

Serverless Cost Model

Holding the Load follows a serverless-style philosophy:

  • Resources scale based on demand
  • You pay only for actual usage
  • Idle time costs almost nothing

This is particularly useful when:

  • Spikes are rare but intense
  • Traffic patterns are unpredictable
  • You want cost efficiency without sacrificing reliability

Typical Use Cases

Holding the Load works especially well for:

  • Automation platforms like N8N
  • Self-hosted workflow engines
  • Api
  • Ai agents where react based webhook event

Why I Built It

I built Holding the Load after noticing a recurring pattern in self-hosted systems:

We scale infrastructure to handle rare peaks, not real workloads.

Holding the Load flips that logic:

  • Keep the VPS small and cheap
  • Scale only the ingestion layer
  • Let processing happen at a controlled pace

Final Thoughts

Holding the Load is not a replacement for queues, workers, or job schedulers.

It’s a protective layer.

A buffer that:

  • Shields your VPS
  • Controls load
  • Reduces cost
  • Improves reliability

If you rely on webhooks and self-host your infrastructure, this tool can simplify your scaling strategy.

Here’s the updated ending with the project link added cleanly and naturally for a tech blog:

Final Thoughts

Holding the Load is not a replacement for queues, workers, or job schedulers.

It’s a protective layer.

A buffer that:

  • Shields your VPS
  • Controls load
  • Reduces cost
  • Improves reliability

If you rely on webhooks and self-host your infrastructure, this pattern can dramatically simplify your scaling strategy.

Project Repository

You can find the full source code, documentation, and examples here:

👉 https://github.com/tiago123456789/holding-the-load

Feedback, issues, and contributions are welcome.

Need Help or Want to Talk?

If you’re facing webhook scaling issues, evaluating this architecture, or need help adapting Holding the Load to your own setup, feel free to reach out.

I’m happy to:

  • Discuss real-world use cases
  • Help with architecture decisions
  • Answer questions about the project
  • Support integrations or custom scenarios

📧 Email: tiagorosadacost@gmail.com

ai #aiagents #automation #n8n #aichatbot #chatbot

Top comments (0)